Literature DB >> 8288670

Relative motion of hip stems under load. An in vitro study of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and custom asymmetrical designs.

J Hua1, P S Walker.   

Abstract

Symmetrical, asymmetrical, and custom asymmetrical stems without collars were manufactured and inserted without cement, in that order, into each of eight femora. Displacement transducers were mounted at different locations to measure relative motion between the stem and the bone. A load was applied to simulate the forces acting on a hip joint in a single-limb stance. A force of 1000 newtons was applied three times in order to seat the prosthesis, and then a cyclical force of 1000 newtons was applied to the head of the prosthesis; readings of relative motion were taken every 500 cycles, until 2500 cycles had been reached. The relative motion diminished as the number of cycles increased, with most of the reduction occurring within the first 500 cycles. The symmetrical stem had the least relative axial motion, with an average of six micrometers, but the other stems also had low values: eleven micrometers for the custom stem, and nineteen micrometers for the asymmetrical stem. In terms of axial rotation, however, the symmetrical stem had several times more motion than did the other two stems. Motion of the stem tip toward or away from the canal in the frontal plane and in the sagittal plane also was higher for the symmetrical stem. Axial migration (permanent sinkage after 2500 cycles) was very similar between all three types of stem. In a torsional loading test, the symmetrical stem showed about ten times more relative rotational motion than did the other two stems. Over-all, the custom stem and the asymmetrical stem had similar results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8288670     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199401000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  4 in total

1.  The Adaptiva custom-made stem--our reasons for not using it anymore.

Authors:  Patrik Karl Reize; Nikolaus Wülker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in young patients with juvenile chronic arthritis.

Authors:  M N Kumar; M Swann
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Stem diameter and rotational stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  R Michael Meneghini; Nadim J Hallab; Richard A Berger; Joshua J Jacobs; Wayne G Paprosky; Aaron G Rosenberg
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  The geometry of the bone structure associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zhang Yang; Wang Jian; Zhi-han Li; Xiao Jun; Zhao Liang; Yan Ge; Zhan-jun Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.