Literature DB >> 8287791

Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice.

M Mark1, T Lufkin, J L Vonesch, E Ruberte, J C Olivo, P Dollé, P Gorry, A Lumsden, P Chambon.   

Abstract

This study provides a detailed description of the anatomical defects in the Hoxa-1-/- mutant mice previously generated in our laboratory (T. Lufkin, A. Dierich, M. LeMeur, M. Mark and P. Chambon, 1991; Cell 66, 1105-1119). Three-dimensional reconstructions of the Hoxa-1-/- rhombencephalon reveals that it bears only five rhombomeric structures (ie. morphological segments) instead of the normal seven. The first three of these rhombomeres appear normal as judged from the distribution pattern of CRABPI transcripts in the neurectoderm and from the histological analysis of the cranial nerve components derived from these structures. In contrast, the neural-crest-cell-free region normally located opposite rhombomere 5 is lacking in Hoxa-1-/- embryos, and motor neurons of the facial and abducens nerves, which normally differentiate within rhombomeres 4, 5 and 6, are missing in Hoxa-1-/- fetuses. These morphological data, combined with the determination of the molecular positional identities of the rhombomeres 4 and 5 (P. Dollé, T. Lufkin, R. Krumlauf, M. Mark, D. Duboule and P. Chambon, 1993; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, in press), suggest that rhombomere 4 is markedly reduced, whereas rhombomere 5 is almost absent. Thus, the remnants of rhombomeres 4 and 5 appear to be fused caudally with rhombomere 6 to form a single fourth rhombomeric structure. Moreover, the migration of neural crest cells contributing to the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves occurs in a more rostral position, resulting in abnormalities of these cranial nerves, which were visualized by whole-mount anti-neurofilament immunostaining. The mutual relationship along the rostrocaudal axis between the otic pit and the neuroepithelial site of int-2 protein secretion (a putative otogenic cue) is not significantly changed in Hoxa-1-/- embryos. However, the abnormal relationship between the rhombencephalon and the epithelial inner ear may account for the aplasia and faulty differentiation of the membranous labyrinth, the disruption of the cartilaginous otic capsule and the disorganisation of some middle ear structures. This phenotype is compared with that of the Hoxa-1-/- mutants generated by O. Chisaka, T. S. Musci and M. R. Capecchi, 1992 (Nature 335, 516-520) and with that of the mice homozygous for the kreisler mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8287791     DOI: 10.1242/dev.119.2.319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  62 in total

1.  Molecular genetics of pattern formation in the inner ear: do compartment boundaries play a role?

Authors:  J V Brigande; A E Kiernan; X Gao; L E Iten; D M Fekete
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mammalian achaete-scute and atonal homologs regulate neuronal versus glial fate determination in the central nervous system.

Authors:  K Tomita; K Moriyoshi; S Nakanishi; F Guillemot; R Kageyama
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-10-16       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Hes1 and Hes3 regulate maintenance of the isthmic organizer and development of the mid/hindbrain.

Authors:  H Hirata; K Tomita; Y Bessho; R Kageyama
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Krox20 and kreisler co-operate in the transcriptional control of segmental expression of Hoxb3 in the developing hindbrain.

Authors:  Miguel Manzanares; Jeannette Nardelli; Pascale Gilardi-Hebenstreit; Heather Marshall; François Giudicelli; María Teresa Martínez-Pastor; Robb Krumlauf; Patrick Charnay
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 5.  From hindbrain segmentation to breathing after birth: developmental patterning in rhombomeres 3 and 4.

Authors:  Fabrice Chatonnet; Eduardo Domínguez del Toro; Muriel Thoby-Brisson; Jean Champagnat; Gilles Fortin; Filippo M Rijli; Christelle Thaëron-Antôno
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.590

6.  Specification of the mammalian cochlea is dependent on Sonic hedgehog.

Authors:  Martin M Riccomagno; Lenka Martinu; Michael Mulheisen; Doris K Wu; Douglas J Epstein
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Clinical characterization of the HOXA1 syndrome BSAS variant.

Authors:  T M Bosley; M A Salih; I A Alorainy; D T Oystreck; M Nester; K K Abu-Amero; M A Tischfield; E C Engle
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  Hox genes: choreographers in neural development, architects of circuit organization.

Authors:  Polyxeni Philippidou; Jeremy S Dasen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  The fates of zebrafish Hox gene duplicates.

Authors:  Chris Jozefowicz; James McClintock; Victoria Prince
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

10.  Differential expression of bone morphogenetic proteins in the developing vestibular and auditory sensory organs.

Authors:  S H Oh; R Johnson; D K Wu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.