Literature DB >> 8285609

Double-blind, comparative study of rufloxacin once daily versus amoxicillin three times a day in treatment of outpatients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

W Klietmann1, M Cesana, R K Rondel, J Focht.   

Abstract

In a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of two dosage schedules of rufloxacin once daily were compared with those of amoxicillin three times a day in the treatment of 192 outpatients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Rufloxacin was given as a single oral dose of 400 mg on day 1 and single daily doses of 200 mg on the subsequent 9 days (n = 64) or as 300 mg on day 1 and then 150 mg daily for 9 days (n = 63); amoxicillin was given as 500 mg orally three times a day for 10 days (n = 65). Clinical and bacteriological assessments were carried out before treatment, between study days 3 and 5, and at days 1 and 8 after treatment. Pretreatment cultures were positive for 139 patients, the most frequently isolated pathogens being Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae. Clinical success rates were comparable in the three groups (94, 95, and 98%, respectively), as were bacteriological success rates at the end of treatment (93, 95, and 91%, respectively) and at follow-up (88, 95, and 98%, respectively). The power to detect a significant 15% difference in cure rates was 74.9%. Follow-up bacteriological failures from pneumococcal infection were 18% in both rufloxacin groups combined and 5% in the amoxicillin group. The 200-mg dose regimen achieved average steady-state concentrations in plasma higher than did the 150-mg dose regimen (3.75 versus 2.72 micrograms/ml). Adverse events occurred in 11 and 13 patients, respectively, on rufloxacin and 8 on amoxicillin. This study shows that rufloxacin once daily ay be a possible option for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 200-mg daily oral dose preceeded by a loading dose of 400 mg displays a better pharmacokinetic profile than the lower dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8285609      PMCID: PMC192382          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.37.11.2298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  21 in total

1.  Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.

Authors:  P R Murray; J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  The Second European Collaborative Study on the frequency of antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  F H Kayser; G Morenzoni; P Santanam
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Treatment of Branhamella catarrhalis infections.

Authors:  B I Davies; F P Maesen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Comparative in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from clinical isolates.

Authors:  W Klietmann; J Focht; K Nösner
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1987-06

Review 5.  New mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  G A Jacoby; G L Archer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Pneumococcal resistance to antibiotics.

Authors:  K P Klugman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Inter- and intrasubject variabilities in the pharmacokinetics of rufloxacin after single oral administration to healthy volunteers.

Authors:  B P Imbimbo; G Broccali; M Cesana; F Crema; G Attardo-Parrinello
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Safety and efficacy of temafloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in lower respiratory tract infections: a randomized, double-blind trial.

Authors:  G Lindsay; H J Scorer; C M Carnegie
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Quinolonecarboxylic acids. 2. Synthesis and antibacterial evaluation of 7-oxo-2,3-dihydro-7H-pyrido[1,2,3-de][1,4]benzothiazine-6-carboxylic acids.

Authors:  V Cecchetti; A Fravolini; R Fringuelli; G Mascellani; P Pagella; M Palmioli; G Segre; P Terni
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  Acute bacterial exacerbations in bronchitis and asthma.

Authors:  S Chodosh
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-04-27       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  3 in total

1.  Absence of effect of rufloxacin on theophylline pharmacokinetics in steady state.

Authors:  M Kinzig-Schippers; U Fuhr; M Cesana; C Müller; A H Staib; S Rietbrock; F Sörgel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro antimycoplasmal activities of rufloxacin and its metabolite MF 922.

Authors:  P M Furneri; G Bisignano; G Cerniglia; G Nicoletti; M Cesana; G Tempera
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Single-dose rufloxacin versus 3-day norfloxacin treatment of uncomplicated cystitis: clinical evaluation and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  G Del Río; F Dalet; L Aguilar; J Caffaratti; R Dal-Ré
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.191

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.