PURPOSE: To test the usefulness of lower limb Doppler venous compression ultrasound (US) and serum D-dimer measurements in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients in whom ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scans indicate intermediate probability of pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: V-P scanning, pulmonary angiography, US, and D-dimer measurements were performed in 36 patients without known deep venous thrombosis but with intermediate probability of having a pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: Pulmonary angiography demonstrated pulmonary embolism in 15 (41%) of 36 patients. US demonstrated deep venous thrombosis in only two patients, both with pulmonary embolism. Sensitivity of US was only 13%, but specificity was 100%. Five (14%) of the 36 patients had normal (< 220 micrograms/L) D-dimer levels; none of the five had pulmonary embolism. Sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer values were 100% and 16%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: Combined D-dimer measurement and US were helpful in correctly diagnosing pulmonary embolism in only seven (20%) of 36 patients. Pulmonary angiography is still required to diagnose pulmonary embolism in the majority of patients.
PURPOSE: To test the usefulness of lower limb Doppler venous compression ultrasound (US) and serum D-dimer measurements in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients in whom ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scans indicate intermediate probability of pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: V-P scanning, pulmonary angiography, US, and D-dimer measurements were performed in 36 patients without known deep venous thrombosis but with intermediate probability of having a pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: Pulmonary angiography demonstrated pulmonary embolism in 15 (41%) of 36 patients. US demonstrated deep venous thrombosis in only two patients, both with pulmonary embolism. Sensitivity of US was only 13%, but specificity was 100%. Five (14%) of the 36 patients had normal (< 220 micrograms/L) D-dimer levels; none of the five had pulmonary embolism. Sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer values were 100% and 16%, respectively, with a negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: Combined D-dimer measurement and US were helpful in correctly diagnosing pulmonary embolism in only seven (20%) of 36 patients. Pulmonary angiography is still required to diagnose pulmonary embolism in the majority of patients.