Literature DB >> 8284290

Cytogenetic analysis of 2928 CVS samples and 1075 amniocenteses from randomized studies.

S Smidt-Jensen1, A M Lind, M Permin, J M Zachary, C Lundsteen, J Philip.   

Abstract

We report cytogenetic results from a randomized Danish chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and amniocentesis (AC) study including 2928 placental and 1075 amniotic fluid specimens processed in the same laboratory. The results are presented in groups comparing CVS with amniocentesis and transabdominal (TA) CVS with transcervical (TC) CVS as randomized. More abnormalities and more ambiguous diagnostic problems were found in placental tissues than in amniotic cells. There were no diagnostic errors and no incorrect sex predictions. Mosaicism was detected in 1 per cent of all cases of CVS (discordancies included). When confirmation studies were done, 90 per cent were found to be confined to the placenta. Eight cases (0.7 per cent) of mosaicism/pseudomosaicism were seen in amniotic fluid specimens, and two cases of five with confirmation studies were confirmed in the fetus. The rate of mosaicism/pseudomosaicism in CVS and AC specimens differed (p < 0.05). The rate of pseudomosaicism in cultures of villi and amniotic fluid cells was 0.5 and 0.6 per cent, respectively. Single-cell aneuploidy was observed in 1.8 per cent of villi and 1.4 per cent of amniotic fluid cell specimens. Maternal cell contamination (MCC) was seen more often after TC sampling (4.5 per cent) compared with TA sampling (1.5 per cent), but posed no problems in interpretation. Compared with the processing of cultured specimens, the short-term method of preparation of villi in our laboratory doubled the technicians' workload. For practical and economic reasons we have ceased the routine use of short-term preparations.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8284290     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970130807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  4 in total

Review 1.  Review: preimplantation diagnosis of inherited disease.

Authors:  W Lissens; K Sermon; C Staessen; E V Assche; C Janssenswillen; H Joris; A Van Steirteghem; I Liebaers
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.982

2.  Evidence-based clinical prioritization of embryos with mosaic results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ali Mourad; Roland Antaki; François Bissonnette; Obey Al Baini; Boutros Saadeh; Wael Jamal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Parental genomes segregate into distinct blastomeres during multipolar zygotic divisions leading to mixoploid and chimeric blastocysts.

Authors:  Tine De Coster; Heleen Masset; Olga Tšuiko; Maaike Catteeuw; Yan Zhao; Nicolas Dierckxsens; Ainhoa Larreategui Aparicio; Eftychia Dimitriadou; Sophie Debrock; Karen Peeraer; Marta de Ruijter-Villani; Katrien Smits; Ann Van Soom; Joris Robert Vermeesch
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 17.906

Review 4.  Chromosomal Mosaicism in Human Feto-Placental Development: Implications for Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Francesca Romana Grati
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.