BACKGROUND: In hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), intrinsic myocardial systolic function may be normal or depressed. Magnetic resonance tagging can depict intramural myocardial shortening in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tagged left ventricular magnetic resonance images were obtained in 30 hypertensive subjects with LVH (mean LV mass index, 142 +/- 41 g/m) and normal ejection fraction (mean, 64 +/- 9%) using spatial modulation of magnetization. In 26 subjects, circumferential myocardial shortening (%S) was compared with results obtained in 10 normal subjects at endocardium, midwall, and epicardium on up to 4 short-axis slices each. Similarly, in 10 subjects, midwall long-axis shortening at basal, midventricular, and apical sites was compared with results obtained in 12 normal volunteers. Circumferential %S was reduced in hypertensive subjects. Mean shortening was 29 +/- 6% at the endocardium in hypertensive subjects versus 44 +/- 6% in normal subjects (P = .0001); 20 +/- 6% at the midwall versus 30 +/- 6% (P = .0001); and 13 +/- 5% at the epicardium versus 21 +/- 5% (P = .0002). However, the transmural gradient in percent shortening from endocardium to epicardium in hypertensive subjects paralleled that in normal subjects. The normal base-to-apex gradient in circumferential %S was absent in LVH. In contrast to normal subjects, circumferential %S showed regional heterogeneity in hypertensive subjects, being maximal in the lateral wall and least in the inferior wall. Longitudinal shortening was also uniformly depressed in hypertensive subjects: 10 +/- 9% at the base versus 21 +/- 6% in normal subjects (P = .0001); 14 +/- 8% at the midventricle versus 18 +/- 3% (P = .03); and 14 +/- 8% at the apex versus 18 +/- 4% (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive LVH with normal pump function, intramural circumferential and longitudinal myocardial shortening are depressed.
BACKGROUND: In hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), intrinsic myocardial systolic function may be normal or depressed. Magnetic resonance tagging can depict intramural myocardial shortening in vivo. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tagged left ventricular magnetic resonance images were obtained in 30 hypertensive subjects with LVH (mean LV mass index, 142 +/- 41 g/m) and normal ejection fraction (mean, 64 +/- 9%) using spatial modulation of magnetization. In 26 subjects, circumferential myocardial shortening (%S) was compared with results obtained in 10 normal subjects at endocardium, midwall, and epicardium on up to 4 short-axis slices each. Similarly, in 10 subjects, midwall long-axis shortening at basal, midventricular, and apical sites was compared with results obtained in 12 normal volunteers. Circumferential %S was reduced in hypertensive subjects. Mean shortening was 29 +/- 6% at the endocardium in hypertensive subjects versus 44 +/- 6% in normal subjects (P = .0001); 20 +/- 6% at the midwall versus 30 +/- 6% (P = .0001); and 13 +/- 5% at the epicardium versus 21 +/- 5% (P = .0002). However, the transmural gradient in percent shortening from endocardium to epicardium in hypertensive subjects paralleled that in normal subjects. The normal base-to-apex gradient in circumferential %S was absent in LVH. In contrast to normal subjects, circumferential %S showed regional heterogeneity in hypertensive subjects, being maximal in the lateral wall and least in the inferior wall. Longitudinal shortening was also uniformly depressed in hypertensive subjects: 10 +/- 9% at the base versus 21 +/- 6% in normal subjects (P = .0001); 14 +/- 8% at the midventricle versus 18 +/- 3% (P = .03); and 14 +/- 8% at the apex versus 18 +/- 4% (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: In hypertensive LVH with normal pump function, intramural circumferential and longitudinal myocardial shortening are depressed.
Authors: Raymond T Yan; David Bluemke; Antoinette Gomes; Gregory Burke; Steve Shea; Kiang Liu; Hossein Bahrami; Shantanu Sinha; Colin Wu; Veronica Fernandes; Robyn McClelland; João A C Lima Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Simone Romano; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; Han W Kim; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Richard B Devereux; Pablo Salazar; Michael Trybula; Richard C Chia; Kaleigh Evans; Afshin Farzaneh-Far Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-11-05
Authors: Mustafa I Ahmed; Ravi V Desai; Krishna K Gaddam; Bharath A Venkatesh; Shilpi Agarwal; Seidu Inusah; Steven G Lloyd; Thomas S Denney; David Calhoun; Louis J Dell'italia; Himanshu Gupta Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-03
Authors: Cesare Russo; Zhezhen Jin; Fusako Sera; Edward S Lee; Shunichi Homma; Tatjana Rundek; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.792