Literature DB >> 8281594

Anaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy: a comparison between tracheal intubation and the armoured laryngeal mask airway.

A C Webster1, P K Morley-Forster, S Dain, S Ganapathy, R Ruby, A Au, M J Cook.   

Abstract

A prototype armoured laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was compared with tracheal intubation (ETT) for anaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy. Fifty-five children were randomised into the LMA group and 54 into the ETT group. During insertion of the LMA, peripheral oxyhaemoglobin desaturation (SpO2) < 94% occurred in ten patients (18.2%) and in seven patients (13%) during tracheal intubation (NS). After opening the Boyle-Davis gag, airway obstruction occurred in ten patients (18.2%) in the LMA group and in three patients (6%) in the ETT group (P = 0.07). In five patients (9%) the LMA was abandoned in favour of tracheal intubation. In all others (91%), when the need for adequate depth of anaesthesia was realized, a satisfactory airway was achieved more rapidly than with tracheal intubation (P < 0.001), and maintained throughout surgery. Manually assisted ventilation was required in all patients in the ETT group, mean duration 373 +/- 385 sec, and in 26 patients (52%) in the LMA group, mean duration 134 +/- 110 sec, P < 0.001. Mean end-tidal CO2 (PetCO2) was 45.5 +/- 6.21 mmHg in the ETT group and 46.6 +/- 6.09 in the LMA group (NS). The LMA did not limit surgical access. Heart rate, MAP and blood loss in the LMA group were 110 +/- 21, 74 +/- 9 mmHg and 1.92 +/- 1.22 ml.kg-1 respectively, compared with 143 +/- 13 (P < 0.001), 85 +/- 12 mmHg (P < 0.001) and 2.62 +/- 1.36 ml.kg-1 (P < 0.05) with tracheal intubation. Fibreoptic laryngoscopy at the end of surgery in 19 patients in the LMA group revealed no blood in the larynx.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8281594     DOI: 10.1007/BF03009607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  15 in total

1.  Anaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy; a critical approach.

Authors:  A DOUGHTY
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1957-09       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Herniation of RAE tube through split Boyle Davis gag.

Authors:  A K Sen; B Gupta
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.669

3.  The laryngeal mask airway. A study of 100 patients during spontaneous breathing.

Authors:  P M Brodrick; N R Webster; J F Nunn
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  The laryngeal mask airway: clinical appraisal in 250 patients.

Authors:  J R Maltby; R G Loken; N C Watson
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  The laryngeal mask airway in children.

Authors:  D G Mason; R M Bingham
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Postintubation croup in children.

Authors:  B V Koka; I S Jeon; J M Andre; I MacKay; R M Smith
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  The laryngeal mask--a new concept in airway management.

Authors:  A I Brain
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  The laryngeal mask airway. Development and preliminary trials of a new type of airway.

Authors:  A I Brain; T D McGhee; E J McAteer; A Thomas; M A Abu-Saad; J A Bushman
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Laryngospasm during anaesthesia. A computer-aided incidence study in 136,929 patients.

Authors:  G L Olsson; B Hallen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 2.105

10.  Accidental bronchial intubation with RAE tubes.

Authors:  A E Black; A M Mackersie
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  13 in total

1.  [Tonsillectomies and the reinforced laryngeal mask].

Authors:  D Boisson-Bertrand
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Brimacombe
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Anaesthesia for adenotonsillectomy.

Authors:  T Hackmann
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  The laryngeal mask airway in anaesthesia.

Authors:  J R Maltby
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Clinical Comparison of I-Gel Supraglottic Airway Device and Cuffed Endotracheal Tube for Pressure-Controlled Ventilation During Routine Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Ankur Dhanda; Shalendra Singh; Anju R Bhalotra; Siddharth Chavali
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-10-01

6.  A prospective randomized study for the placement of flexible laryngeal airway mask with two-step jaw-thrust technique by both hands for adults.

Authors:  Ying Wan; Ying Liu; Wenjing Yang; Xu Cui
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  The use of laryngeal mask airway during transesophageal echocardiography in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Mohammed A Shafi Ahmed; Abdulmohsin A Al-Ghamdi; Hany A Mowafi; Roshdy R Al-Metwalli; Wesam F Mousa; Amer A Lardhi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-10

Review 8.  Airway Complications during and after General Anesthesia: A Comparison, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Using Flexible Laryngeal Mask Airways and Endotracheal Tubes.

Authors:  Rui Xu; Ying Lian; Wen Xian Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of I-gel versus Endotracheal Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Control Study.

Authors:  Manohar Panneer; Saravana Babu; Prakash Murugaiyan
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 10.  Advantages, Disadvantages, Indications, Contraindications and Surgical Technique of Laryngeal Airway Mask.

Authors:  Anubhav Jannu; Ashim Shekar; Ramdas Balakrishna; H Sudarshan; G C Veena; S Bhuvaneshwari
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-12-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.