Literature DB >> 8281243

Fluoxetine compared with imipramine in the treatment of inpatient depression. A multicenter trial.

C M Beasley1, S L Holman, J H Potvin.   

Abstract

Fluoxetine and imipramine were compared in a six-week, double-blind, randomized trial in 118 men and women, ages 18 to 70 years, hospitalized for major depressive disorder. Treatment groups were comparable at baseline. Median maintenance doses were: fluoxetine, 80 mg/day; imipramine, 200 mg/day. Efficacy with fluoxetine and imipramine was comparable: none of the between-treatment differences was statistically significant. Mean +/- standard deviation baseline HAMD21 total scores and change (last-visit-carried-forward analysis), respectively, were fluoxetine, 28.0 +/- 5.3 and -8.5 +/- 9.9; imipramine, 27.0 +/- 5.8 and -11.9 +/- 9.0. Response and remission rates, respectively, were fluoxetine, 54.5 and 21.2%; imipramine, 60.0 and 34.3%. Discontinuations for adverse events were comparable (fluoxetine, 21.4%; imipramine, 22.6%). Common treatment-emergent events with fluoxetine were dry mouth (28.6%), constipation (17.9%), and somnolence (17.9%); those with imipramine were dry mouth (58.1%), constipation (32.3%), and headache (22.6%). Fluoxetine was as effective as imipramine in this population of inpatients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8281243     DOI: 10.3109/10401239309148983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 1040-1237            Impact factor:   1.567


  7 in total

1.  Adverse effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E Trindade; D Menon; L A Topfer; C Coloma
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Interaction of different antidepressants with acute and chronic methadone in mice, and possible clinical implications.

Authors:  Shaul Schreiber; Yonatan Barak; Avner Hostovsky; Renana Baratz-Goldstein; Ina Volis; Vardit Rubovitch; Chaim G Pick
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.444

Review 3.  Economic considerations in the prescribing of third-generation antidepressants.

Authors:  Stuart Montgomery; John J Doyle; Lee Stern; Christopher R McBurney
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.

Authors:  A Cipriani; P Brambilla; T Furukawa; J Geddes; M Gregis; M Hotopf; L Malvini; C Barbui
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

5.  Metabolomic identification of biochemical changes induced by fluoxetine and imipramine in a chronic mild stress mouse model of depression.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Yang-Hee Jung; Choon-Gon Jang; Kwang-Hoon Chun; Sung Won Kwon; Jeongmi Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Antidepressant-like activity of YL-0919: a novel combined selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and 5-HT1A receptor agonist.

Authors:  Hong-xia Chen; Zeng-liang Jin; Li-ming Zhang; Rui Xue; Xiao-dan Xu; Nan Zhao; Zhi-kun Qiu; Xian-wang Wang; You-zhi Zhang; Ri-fang Yang; Yun-feng Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pharmacometric Analyses to Support Early Development Decisions for LY2878735: A Novel Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor.

Authors:  E Raddad; M R Melhem; J S Sloan-Lancaster; J W Miller; S A Van Wart; C M Rubino
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2013-08-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.