BACKGROUND: Oncologists, health care workers and health organizations consider well-performed teaching programs in clinical oncology a fundamental step in cancer control. The aim of our study was to assess the views of teachers and students on the present status of oncology teaching in Italian medical schools and on the most common shortcomings in cancer education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was carried out among teachers and students of 17 Italian medical schools using two different questionnaires. Six hundred forty-seven students of Northern, Central and Southern Italy in the final two years (5th and 6th) of their medical curriculum and 87 professors of pathology, surgery, internal medicine and medical oncology completed the questionnaires. RESULTS: Doctor/patient relationships and integration among disciplines were the most unsatisfactory aspects of oncology teaching, according to students. Biology, epidemiology, radiotherapy, and medical treatment were felt to be insufficiently treated, whilst diagnostic aspects, clinical management and surgery were rated sufficient. The median number of cancer patients to whom each student had access during his/her training was limited, averaging only 13 patients; however, a high degree of variability was noted. A larger number of patients was generally observed in smaller, less crowded medical schools, with notable exceptions. Although the majority of teachers had clinical practices related to their disciplines, only a small number of students underwent a period of clinical training. Traditional methods of teaching were preferred to innovative methods, while interaction among disciplines was uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: This survey emphasizes the dualism between students' expectations and teachers' ideas about cancer teaching. Doctor/patient relationships and poor attention to practical clinical problems seem the most critical issues for clinical oncology training in Italian medical schools.
BACKGROUND: Oncologists, health care workers and health organizations consider well-performed teaching programs in clinical oncology a fundamental step in cancer control. The aim of our study was to assess the views of teachers and students on the present status of oncology teaching in Italian medical schools and on the most common shortcomings in cancer education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was carried out among teachers and students of 17 Italian medical schools using two different questionnaires. Six hundred forty-seven students of Northern, Central and Southern Italy in the final two years (5th and 6th) of their medical curriculum and 87 professors of pathology, surgery, internal medicine and medical oncology completed the questionnaires. RESULTS: Doctor/patient relationships and integration among disciplines were the most unsatisfactory aspects of oncology teaching, according to students. Biology, epidemiology, radiotherapy, and medical treatment were felt to be insufficiently treated, whilst diagnostic aspects, clinical management and surgery were rated sufficient. The median number of cancerpatients to whom each student had access during his/her training was limited, averaging only 13 patients; however, a high degree of variability was noted. A larger number of patients was generally observed in smaller, less crowded medical schools, with notable exceptions. Although the majority of teachers had clinical practices related to their disciplines, only a small number of students underwent a period of clinical training. Traditional methods of teaching were preferred to innovative methods, while interaction among disciplines was uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: This survey emphasizes the dualism between students' expectations and teachers' ideas about cancer teaching. Doctor/patient relationships and poor attention to practical clinical problems seem the most critical issues for clinical oncology training in Italian medical schools.