Literature DB >> 8280488

The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptors, determined by both immunohistochemistry and ligand binding assays, in primary epithelial ovarian cancer: a pilot study.

M E van der Burg1, S C Henzen-Logmans, J A Foekens, E M Berns, C J Rodenburg, W L van Putten, J G Klijn.   

Abstract

After our previous studies on the incidence of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGF-R) and its relationships with other tumour characteristics in more than 100 ovarian tumours, in the present study we investigated the prognostic value of EGF-R with respect to progression-free survival in 50 patients with primary ovarian cancer and sufficient follow-up (median 26 months, range 10-33 months). EGF-R was measured by both biochemical and two immunohistochemical methods, using two monoclonal antibodies (MAb), in addition to oestrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR). EGF-R by ligand binding assay and Scatchard analysis were detectable in 63% of the tumours, by immunohistochemistry with MAb 2E9 in 82% and with MAb EGF-R1 in 78% of the tumours. ER-positivity was found in 58% and PgR-positivity in 38% of the patients. The results of the three measurements of EGF-R showed only weak to moderate associations with Spearman rank correlations (Rs) between 0.13 and 0.46. ER and PgR were only weakly correlated (Rs = 0.20) and they showed no significant association with EGF-R status. There was no clear evidence of the existence of correlations between receptor values and FIGO stage and tumour rest. Univariate Cox regression analyses showed that a higher FIGO stage and larger tumour rest were associated with shorter progression-free survival (P = 0.001), while PgR positivity was associated with a longer progression-free survival (P = 0.02). The level of EGF-R (irrespective of the method of determination used) showed a positive correlation with the risk of progression, but this correlation was not statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8280488     DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90451-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  8 in total

1.  The epidermal growth factor receptor responsive miR-125a represses mesenchymal morphology in ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Karen D Cowden Dahl; Richard Dahl; Jessica N Kruichak; Laurie G Hudson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  PEA3 is necessary for optimal epidermal growth factor receptor-stimulated matrix metalloproteinase expression and invasion of ovarian tumor cells.

Authors:  Karen D Cowden Dahl; Reema Zeineldin; Laurie G Hudson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 5.852

3.  The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) in primary breast cancer: results of a 10 year follow-up study.

Authors:  J G Klijn; M P Look; H Portengen; J Alexieva-Figusch; W L van Putten; J A Foekens
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Prognostic significance of HER3 and HER4 protein expression in colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Panteleimon Kountourakis; Kitty Pavlakis; Amanda Psyrri; Dimitra Rontogianni; Nikolaos Xiros; Efstratios Patsouris; Dimitrios Pectasides; Theofanis Economopoulos
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  ARID3B Directly Regulates Ovarian Cancer Promoting Genes.

Authors:  Alexander Bobbs; Katrina Gellerman; William Morgan Hallas; Stancy Joseph; Chao Yang; Jeffrey Kurkewich; Karen D Cowden Dahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Epidermal growth factor, oestrogen and progesterone receptor expression in primary ovarian cancer: correlation with clinical outcome and response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  G Scambia; P Benedetti-Panici; G Ferrandina; M Distefano; G Salerno; M E Romanini; A Fagotti; S Mancuso
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  The prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA expression in primary ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J M Bartlett; S P Langdon; B J Simpson; M Stewart; D Katsaros; P Sismondi; S Love; W N Scott; A R Williams; A M Lessells; K G Macleod; J F Smyth; W R Miller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Lack of relationship between EGFR-1 immunohistochemical expression and prognosis in a multicentre clinical trial of 93 patients with advanced primary ovarian epithelial cancer (GINECO group).

Authors:  C Elie; J F Geay; M Morcos; A Le Tourneau; V Girre; P Broët; B Marmey; L Chauvenet; J Audouin; E Pujade-Lauraine; S Camilleri-Broët
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.