Literature DB >> 8277799

Characteristics of patients with major depression who received care in general medical and specialty mental health settings.

L Cooper-Patrick1, R M Crum, D E Ford.   

Abstract

The purpose of this analysis was to compare depressed patients receiving care in the general medical setting with depressed patients receiving care in specialty mental health settings. The analysis was limited to 559 respondents from the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study who met criteria for the diagnosis of major depression sometime in the year before the interview as defined by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Patients who received care in the general medical sector were more likely to be black, older than age 65, have a high school education or less, and to be women, and less likely to be in the highest socioeconomic quartile. A higher proportion of specialty mental health patients reported a lifetime history of delusions, met criteria for the diagnosis of panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or schizophrenia, and had a lifetime history of psychiatric hospitalization. Depressed patients seen in the general medical sector had a lower chance of meeting criteria for major depression one year later than those seen in the specialty mental health sector. A multivariate analysis limited to an investigation of the relative importance of sociodemographic factors indicated that the following factors were significantly associated with receiving care in the specialty mental health care sector: age groups 31-50 and 51-65, and single marital status. Black race was inversely correlated with use of specialty mental health care. These results suggest that data generated from the specialty mental health sector can be generalized to the general medical sector only after assessing demographic differences between the two groups. Demographic differences could be associated with differences in knowledge, attitudes, interpretation of symptoms, and treatment preferences related to depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8277799     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  26 in total

1.  Current Status and Future Prospects of Clinical Psychology: Toward a Scientifically Principled Approach to Mental and Behavioral Health Care.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; Richard M McFall; Varda Shoham
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2008-11-01

2.  Effect of depression and diabetes mellitus on the risk for dementia: a national population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Wayne Katon; Henrik Sondergaard Pedersen; Anette Riisgaard Ribe; Morten Fenger-Grøn; Dimitry Davydow; Frans Boch Waldorff; Mogens Vestergaard
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 21.596

3.  Differences between generalists and mental health specialists in the psychiatric treatment of Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  S L Ettner; R C Hermann; H Tang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Integrated Care for Depression in Older Primary Care Patients.

Authors:  Martha L Bruce; Jo Anne Sirey
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.356

5.  Predictors of outcome in a primary care depression trial.

Authors:  E A Walker; W J Katon; J Russo; M Von Korff; E Lin; G Simon; T Bush; E Ludman; J Unützer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Recent care of common mental disorders in the United States : prevalence and conformance with evidence-based recommendations.

Authors:  P S Wang; P Berglund; R C Kessler
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Major depression symptoms in primary care and psychiatric care settings: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Bradley N Gaynes; A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; G K Balasubramani; Donald C Spencer; Timothy Petersen; Michael Klinkman; Diane Warden; Linda Nicholas; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  The recognition of depression: the primary care clinician's perspective.

Authors:  Seong-Yi Baik; Barbara J Bowers; Linda Denise Oakley; Jeffrey L Susman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA): rationale, objectives and methods.

Authors:  Brenda W J H Penninx; Aartjan T F Beekman; Johannes H Smit; Frans G Zitman; Willem A Nolen; Philip Spinhoven; Pim Cuijpers; Peter J De Jong; Harm W J Van Marwijk; Willem J J Assendelft; Klaas Van Der Meer; Peter Verhaak; Michel Wensing; Ron De Graaf; Witte J Hoogendijk; Johan Ormel; Richard Van Dyck
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.035

10.  Antidepressant prescribing patterns: a comparison of blacks and whites in a medicaid population.

Authors:  D A Sclar; L M Robison; T L Skaer; W M Dickson; C M Kozma; C E Reeder
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.