OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the appropriateness of ciprofloxacin-prescribing in the long-term care setting. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A large academically oriented long-term care facility. PATIENTS: Institutionalized elderly patients with a mean age of 88 years. METHODS: One hundred orders were randomly selected for review from all ciprofloxacin orders initiated over a 3-year period. Criteria for appropriateness of ciprofloxacin-prescribing were developed based on a comprehensive review of the medical literature. Evaluation of appropriateness of prescribing was based on the indication for therapy and the availability of more effective and/or less expensive alternative antibiotic regimens. Only information available to the physician at the time of the order was used to judge appropriateness. Abstracted medical records were evaluated independently by a geriatrician and an infectious diseases specialist. RESULTS: With respect to site of infection, the urinary tract accounted for 43% of all ciprofloxacin orders; the lower respiratory tract, 28%; and skin and soft-tissue infections, 17%. Only 25% of orders were judged appropriate. Twenty-three percent of orders were judged less than appropriate based on indication, and 49% due to the availability of a more effective and/or less expensive alternative antibiotic choice. There was insufficient information in the medical record to judge 3% of the orders. CONCLUSION: These results indicate less than optimal prescribing of oral fluoroquinolones in the long-term care setting, with potential consequences including the development of resistant bacterial strains and increased health care costs.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the appropriateness of ciprofloxacin-prescribing in the long-term care setting. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A large academically oriented long-term care facility. PATIENTS: Institutionalized elderly patients with a mean age of 88 years. METHODS: One hundred orders were randomly selected for review from all ciprofloxacin orders initiated over a 3-year period. Criteria for appropriateness of ciprofloxacin-prescribing were developed based on a comprehensive review of the medical literature. Evaluation of appropriateness of prescribing was based on the indication for therapy and the availability of more effective and/or less expensive alternative antibiotic regimens. Only information available to the physician at the time of the order was used to judge appropriateness. Abstracted medical records were evaluated independently by a geriatrician and an infectious diseases specialist. RESULTS: With respect to site of infection, the urinary tract accounted for 43% of all ciprofloxacin orders; the lower respiratory tract, 28%; and skin and soft-tissue infections, 17%. Only 25% of orders were judged appropriate. Twenty-three percent of orders were judged less than appropriate based on indication, and 49% due to the availability of a more effective and/or less expensive alternative antibiotic choice. There was insufficient information in the medical record to judge 3% of the orders. CONCLUSION: These results indicate less than optimal prescribing of oral fluoroquinolones in the long-term care setting, with potential consequences including the development of resistant bacterial strains and increased health care costs.
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Michele L Shaffer; Mark B Loeb; Jane L Givens; Daniel Habtemariam; Dan K Kiely; Erika D'Agata Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Paschalis Vergidis; Davidson H Hamer; Simin N Meydani; Gerard E Dallal; Tamar F Barlam Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-05-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: M Méan; P Pavese; J P Vittoz; L Foroni; C Decouchon; J P Stahl; P François Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Aurora Pop-Vicas; E Tacconelli; Stefan Gravenstein; Bing Lu; Erika M C D'Agata Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Susan L Mitchell; Michele L Shaffer; Dan K Kiely; Jane L Givens; Erika D'Agata Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2012-08-25 Impact factor: 3.250