BACKGROUND: Studies of acute surgical wounds in pigs have shown granulomatous tissue reactions induced by hydrocolloid dressings. OBJECTIVE: We examined biopsy specimens from chronic wounds in humans treated with hydrocolloid or nonhydrocolloid dressings to determine whether such reactions occurred. METHODS: A blinded retrospective analysis of 22 chronic ulcer biopsy specimens from 22 patients was performed by two dermatopathologists independently. RESULTS: No differences were seen between hydrocolloid-treated and non-hydrocolloid-treated wounds. Granulation tissue was seen in all specimens. No cavities, eosinophilic inclusions, polarizable material, or multinucleated giant cells were identified. CONCLUSION: There are no significant histologic differences between hydrocolloid-treated and non-hydrocolloid-treated wounds in humans.
BACKGROUND: Studies of acute surgical wounds in pigs have shown granulomatous tissue reactions induced by hydrocolloid dressings. OBJECTIVE: We examined biopsy specimens from chronic wounds in humans treated with hydrocolloid or nonhydrocolloid dressings to determine whether such reactions occurred. METHODS: A blinded retrospective analysis of 22 chronic ulcer biopsy specimens from 22 patients was performed by two dermatopathologists independently. RESULTS: No differences were seen between hydrocolloid-treated and non-hydrocolloid-treated wounds. Granulation tissue was seen in all specimens. No cavities, eosinophilic inclusions, polarizable material, or multinucleated giant cells were identified. CONCLUSION: There are no significant histologic differences between hydrocolloid-treated and non-hydrocolloid-treated wounds in humans.
Authors: Giovanni Mosti; Maria Letizia Iabichella; Pietro Picerni; Antonio Magliaro; Vincenzo Mattaliano Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.315