Literature DB >> 8275679

Methods in heart rate variability analysis: which tachogram should we choose?

M J Janssen1, C A Swenne, J de Bie, O Rompelman, J H van Bemmel.   

Abstract

We investigated the practical impact of the representation of the cardiac rhythm--the cardiotachogram--on two elementary spectral indexes in heart rate variability analysis: the low-frequency (0.07-0.14 Hz) and high-frequency (0.14-0.40 Hz) powers. Five commonly used tachograms (inter-beat interval function/series, counts, instantaneous heart rate function/series) were compared. Measurements were done on seven volunteers in the supine and standing positions. Ratios, and their deviations from 100%, of alternative power values were calculated. Mean low-frequency and high-frequency ratio deviations ranged from 0 to 5% and from 6 to 37%. The spectrum of counts yielded on average more (15-37%) high-frequency power. Spectra were incomparable without normalization of the tachogram with respect to heart rate. In conclusion, (i) the choice of a particular spectrum may lead to differing conclusions on the vagal contribution to heart rate variability and (ii) inconclusive results from studies using different tachogram variants can partly be due to the omission of normalization.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8275679     DOI: 10.1016/0169-2607(93)90061-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed        ISSN: 0169-2607            Impact factor:   5.428


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of heart rhythm variability by heart rate or heart period: differences, pitfalls and help from logarithms.

Authors:  P Castiglioni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Functional brain-heart interplay extends to the multifractal domain.

Authors:  Vincenzo Catrambone; Riccardo Barbieri; Herwig Wendt; Patrice Abry; Gaetano Valenza
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.