Literature DB >> 8275373

Potential role of nuclear magnetic resonance for the evaluation of trabecular bone quality.

F W Wehrli1, J C Ford, H W Chung, S L Wehrli, J L Williams, M J Grimm, S D Kugelmass, H Jara.   

Abstract

This paper discusses two novel applications of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) as an investigational tool for the assessment of cancellous bone microarchitecture. It further outlines extensions of the method for in vivo clinical evaluation of bone strength in patients with skeletal disorders such as osteoporosis. The first method relies on the hypothesis that the presence of two phases of different magnetic permeability, i.e., bone and bone marrow, causes a spatial nonuniformity of the magnetic field across the measurement volume. The resulting spread in resonance frequency shortens the decay time constant (T2*) of the time domain proton signal in bone marrow or its substitute (water). Increased trabecular spacing, such as it occurs in osteoporosis, reduces the spatial field inhomogeneity and thus prolongs T2*, which has been shown both in vitro and in vivo. Subjects with osteoporosis, characterized by either low bone mineral density and/or spine compression fractures, have T2* values that are significantly prolonged. The second method focuses on a direct measurement of micromorphometric parameters of cancellous bone, using the principles of proton NMR microscopy in conjunction with computer processing of the resulting digital images. Image contrast between the trabeculae and the intertrabecular space is based on the marrow protons providing a signal, as opposed to bone, which appears with background intensity. Once tissues have been classified (into bone and marrow), for example, by means of a histogram-based segmentation algorithm, bone area fraction, mean trabecular plate density (MTPD), and mean trabecular plate thickness (MTPT) can be computed without the need for further operator intervention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8275373     DOI: 10.1007/bf01673429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  27 in total

1.  Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure.

Authors:  J L Kuhn; S A Goldstein; L A Feldkamp; R W Goulet; G Jesion
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  The effect of variation in structure on the Young's modulus of cancellous bone: a comparison of human and non-human material.

Authors:  R Hodgskinson; J D Currey
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure--biomechanical consequences.

Authors:  L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Quantitation of the susceptibility difference between trabecular bone and bone marrow: experimental studies.

Authors:  S Majumdar; D Thomasson; A Shimakawa; H K Genant
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Mathematical modelling of trabecular bone structure: the evaluation of analytical and quantified surface to volume relationships in the femoral head and iliac crest.

Authors:  N L Fazzalari; D J Crisp; B Vernon-Roberts
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Normal postmenopausal women show iliac crest trabecular thickening on vertical sections.

Authors:  A Vesterby; H J Gundersen; F Melsen; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Effects of structural variation on Young's modulus of non-human cancellous bone.

Authors:  R Hodgskinson; J D Currey
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.617

8.  Decreased trabecular width and increased trabecular spacing contribute to bone loss with aging.

Authors:  R S Weinstein; M S Hutson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Three-dimensional MRI microscopy of the normal rat brain.

Authors:  G A Johnson; M B Thompson; B P Drayer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  X-ray microtomography.

Authors:  J C Elliott; S D Dover
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.758

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  In vivo NMR microscopy allows short-term serial assessment of multiple skeletal implications of corticosteroid exposure.

Authors:  Masaya Takahashi; Felix W Wehrli; Luna Hilaire; Babette S Zemel; Scott N Hwang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cylinders or walls? A new computational model to estimate the MR transverse relaxation rate dependence on trabecular bone architecture.

Authors:  Bernd Müller-Bierl; Olivia Louis; Yves Fierens; Nico Buls; Robert Luypaert; Johan de Mey
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Phosphorus-31 in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy of bone fails to diagnose osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Confort-Gouny; J P Mattéi; J Vion-Dury; H Roux; J P Bisset; P J Cozzone
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Trabecular bone structure analysis in the limited spatial resolution regime of in vivo MRI.

Authors:  Jeremy F Magland; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Segmentation of the Proximal Femur from MR Images using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Cem M Deniz; Siyuan Xiang; R Spencer Hallyburton; Arakua Welbeck; James S Babb; Stephen Honig; Kyunghyun Cho; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.