Literature DB >> 8275244

Vestibular and proprioceptive modulation of postural synergies in normal subjects.

J H Allum1, F Honegger, H Schicks.   

Abstract

One way of investigating different muscle synergies underlying human balance control is to assume that only 1 or 2 centrally preprogrammed synergies are available to reestablish upright stance when it is perturbed. According to this hypothesis, the many, apparently different, synergies elicited by rotation or translation of a support-surface on which test subjects stand, in fact, result from a modulation of muscle responses induced by different amplitudes of afferent inputs. To test this hypothesis, we probed the balance control of 16 normal subjects with 5 combinations of rotation and translation of the support surface. Each combination yielded a constant angle (3 or 4 degrees) and angular velocity (18 and 36 degrees/s, respectively) over the first 120 ms of ankle dorsiflexion but resulted in differing velocities of upper leg, trunk, and head movements. These first 120 ms of link movements and the resulting muscle responses were analysed for amplitude and timing modulation using 3 techniques. First, velocities of initial link movements and areas of muscle EMG activity were examined separately for the minimum number of descriptors, which would optimally describe the linear variation of the interlink amplitude synergy with respect to the amount of support-surface rotation or translation employed to perturb balance. Initial trunk angular velocity, which was highly correlated with head linear acceleration (r = 0.9), provided the first best descriptor of initial link movements. Ankle angular velocity provided the second descriptor because it was not correlated with trunk angular velocity. The amplitude modulation synergy of EMG responses could be characterised by the modulation of tibialis anterior and paraspinal muscles between 160 and 240 ms and by that of soleus between 80 and 120 ms after stimulus onset. The linear combination of these best descriptors of link movements and that for EMG response amplitudes changed continuously in an identical manner with changes in the stimulus combination. Second, multivariate linear correlations between the amplitudes of initial link velocities and muscle EMG response areas best describing the response amplitude synergy were examined. Several significant correlations (r > 0.6) were obtained between leg and trunk muscle activity 120 ms after stimulus onset and trunk, or upper leg angular velocity, or head linear velocity, prior to 120 ms. Finally, crosscorrelations between muscle responses were examined for consistent interlink timing synergies between muscle responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8275244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  12 in total

1.  Age-dependent variations in the directional sensitivity of balance corrections and compensatory arm movements in man.

Authors:  J H J Allum; M G Carpenter; F Honegger; A L Adkin; B R Bloem
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Restoring standing capabilities with feedback control of functional neuromuscular stimulation following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Raviraj Nataraj; Musa L Audu; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Decoupling of stretch reflex and background muscle activity during anticipatory postural adjustments in humans.

Authors:  Siddharth Vedula; Robert E Kearney; Ross Wagner; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Increased human stretch reflex dynamic sensitivity with height-induced postural threat.

Authors:  Brian C Horslen; Martin Zaback; J Timothy Inglis; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  The influence of artificially increased hip and trunk stiffness on balance control in man.

Authors:  C Grüneberg; B R Bloem; F Honegger; J H J Allum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vestibular and somatosensory contributions to responses to head and body displacements in stance.

Authors:  F B Horak; C L Shupert; V Dietz; G Horstmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Differences in coding provided by proprioceptive and vestibular sensory signals may contribute to lateral instability in vestibular loss subjects.

Authors:  John H J Allum; Lars B Oude Nijhuis; Mark G Carpenter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Role of cerebellum in learning postural tasks.

Authors:  M E Ioffe; L A Chernikova; K I Ustinova
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.648

9.  The influence of peripheral neuropathy, gender, and obesity on the postural stability of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Aline Herrera-Rangel; Catalina Aranda-Moreno; Teresa Mantilla-Ochoa; Lylia Zainos-Saucedo; Kathrine Jáuregui-Renaud
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.011

10.  Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses.

Authors:  Chiung-Ling Chen; Shu-Zon Lou; Hong-Wen Wu; Shyi-Kuen Wu; Kwok-Tak Yeung; Fong-Chin Su
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.