Literature DB >> 8275072

Is the selective information processing of food and body words specific to patients with eating disorders?

C Perpiñá1, D Hemsley, J Treasure, P de Silva.   

Abstract

The selective processing of food- and body size-related information was investigated using a modified version of the Stroop task. Anorexic and bulimic patients and matched female controls were compared on the basis of categorical (diagnosis), dimensional (restraint and drive for thinness) criteria, or both. The findings suggest that the phenomenon assessed by the Stroop paradigm is not exclusive to patients with a clinical eating disorder, but patients and those control subjects who are restrained eaters with a high drive for thinness share a selective processing of information related to shape and eating. The discussion focuses on the implications of these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8275072     DOI: 10.1002/1098-108x(199311)14:3<359::aid-eat2260140314>3.0.co;2-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Eat Disord        ISSN: 0276-3478            Impact factor:   4.861


  14 in total

1.  Lexical decision times for body shape words as a function of dietary restraint.

Authors:  M W Green; P J Rogers
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Severity of bulimic symptoms is the best predictor of interference on an emotional Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  K L Lokken; H M Marx; F R Ferraro
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Effects of cigarette smoking and abstinence on Stroop task performance.

Authors:  Catherine P Domier; John R Monterosso; Arthur L Brody; Sara L Simon; Adrianna Mendrek; Richard Olmstead; Murray E Jarvik; Mark S Cohen; Edythe D London
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  A systematic review of attentional biases in disorders involving binge eating.

Authors:  Monika Stojek; Lisa M Shank; Anna Vannucci; Diana M Bongiorno; Eric E Nelson; Andrew J Waters; Scott G Engel; Kerri N Boutelle; Daniel S Pine; Jack A Yanovski; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Biases in attention and memory for body shape images in eating disorders.

Authors:  Ashleigh A Pona; Angela C Jones; Tracy L Masterson; Denise D Ben-Porath
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.652

6.  Acute cigarette smoking reduces latencies on a Smoking Stroop test.

Authors:  Catherine P Canamar; Edythe London
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Selective processing of eating and body words in restricting-type anorexics, binge-eating-type anorexics, bulimics, and control subjects.

Authors:  T Léonard; S Divac; I Bichindaritz; S Rouer-Saporta; B Samuel-Lajeunesse
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Classical Stroop effect in bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  S Guillaume; F Van den Eynde; N Samarawickrema; H Broadbent; E Goodman-Smith; U Schmidt
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.652

9.  Cognitive interference from food cues in weight loss maintainers, normal weight, and obese individuals.

Authors:  Suzanne Phelan; Jason Hassenstab; Jeanne M McCaffery; Lawrence Sweet; Hollie A Raynor; Ronald A Cohen; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.002

10.  Body image, visual working memory and visual mental imagery.

Authors:  Stephen Darling; Clare Uytman; Richard J Allen; Jelena Havelka; David G Pearson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.