Literature DB >> 8273842

Establishing a histologic basis for false-negative mammograms.

A B Hollingsworth1, L D Taylor, D C Rhodes.   

Abstract

In order to explore the histology of false-negative mammograms, 264 consecutive patients with breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed until 100 patients with palpable cancers were identified. These patients were imaged by a dedicated mammographer within 6 months prior to biopsy. Nine of the 100 patients had "negative" readings originally, with 6 of the 9 still regarded as negative when re-examined after full knowledge of the tumor location. Histologic review of these six tumors showed a diffusely infiltrative pattern in five patients (three with invasive lobular carcinomas and two with multifocal, invasive ductal carcinomas). Although background breast density always serves in a critical relationship with tumor density on film, only one of these six patients showed a severe degree of mammographic breast density. Diffuse histology should be recognized as a principal cause of false-negative mammograms. Since mammography is based solely on anatomic contrasts, diffuse histology could easily prevent the perfection of this modality, calling attention to the need for improved adjunct imaging techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8273842     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80671-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Soft copy display requirements for digital mammography.

Authors:  Bradley M Hemminger
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Breast conservation for mammographically occult carcinoma.

Authors:  M Morrow; R A Schmidt; C Bucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Redefining the sensitivity of screening mammography: A review.

Authors:  Alan B Hollingsworth
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Mammographic density in postmenopausal women treated with tibolone, estriol or conventional hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  I Valdivia; D Ortega
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Historical Origins for the Overestimation of Mammographic Sensitivity.

Authors:  Alan Hollingsworth; Abraham N Morse
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.