Literature DB >> 8273841

Transrectal ultrasound of rectal tumors.

S M Sentovich1, G J Blatchford, P M Falk, A G Thorson, M A Christensen.   

Abstract

Since preoperative staging of rectal tumors is important in planning treatment, we evaluated transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) staging of rectal neoplasms. In 35 consecutive rectal tumors, we compared TRUS staging results with final pathologic staging. TRUS predicted the degree of tumor invasion in 19 of 24 patients (79%) and the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis in 11 of 15 patients (73%). TRUS overestimated the degree of tumor invasion in four patients (17%) and underestimated invasion in one patient (4%). The depth of tumor invasion was correctly predicted in all 14 tumors located within 6 cm from the anal verge, but, beyond 6 cm, only 5 of 10 tumors (50%) were staged correctly (p = 0.005). In the group of 11 patients who underwent preoperative radiotherapy, pretreatment TRUS predicted the depth of tumor invasion in only six patients (55%) and overestimated tumor invasion in five patients (45%), suggesting that nearly half of these tumors were downstaged by radiotherapy. TRUS accurately predicts the degree of tumor invasion, especially in tumors closer to the anal verge, allowing for better treatment planning in patients with low to middle rectal neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8273841     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80670-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  8 in total

1.  Endorectal ultrasound in the identification of rectal tumors for transanal endoscopic surgery: factors influencing its accuracy.

Authors:  Xavier Serra-Aracil; Ana Gálvez; Laura Mora-López; Pere Rebasa; Sheila Serra-Pla; Anna Pallisera-Lloveras; Carla Zerpa; Oriol Moreno; Salvador Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Does a learning curve exist in endorectal two-dimensional ultrasound accuracy?

Authors:  O J Morris; B Draganic; S Smith
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Comparative study of three-dimensional and conventional endorectal ultrasonography used in rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  J C Kim; Y K Cho; S Y Kim; S K Park; M G Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The learning curve for endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging.

Authors:  Jimmy C M Li; Shirley Y W Liu; Anthony W I Lo; Sophie S F Hon; Simon S M Ng; Janet F Y Lee; Ka Lau Leung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  [Indications for neoadjuvant therapy in rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  F Zimmermann; M Molls
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Surgeon-performed ultrasound: its use in clinical practice.

Authors:  G S Rozycki
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Learning curve for endorectal ultrasound in young and elderly: lights and shades.

Authors:  Alessandra Surace; Alessia Ferrarese; Valentina Gentile; Marco Bindi; Jacopo Cumbo; Mario Solej; Stefano Enrico; Valter Martino
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2016-11-19

8.  How Useful Is Endoscopic Ultrasound in Differentiating T3/T4a T Stage of Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Chaoqun Han; Xuelian Tang; Ming Yang; Kun Zhang; Jun Liu; Rong Lin; Zhen Ding
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.