Literature DB >> 8273536

A new biologically, osmotically, and oncotically balanced gel that shows calcifications blocked by silicone.

R A Ersek, G A Ersek, C L Ersek, J Williams.   

Abstract

The radiodensity of silicone gel-filled breast implants is well documented. It has been suggested that silicone gel may block the transmission of x-rays sufficiently to prevent visualization of microcalcifications that are frequently an indicator of malignancy. A new biologically, oncotically balanced gel has been developed that has increased radiotranslucency to approximately the density of normal breast tissue, increased lubrication qualities, and is quickly and safely eliminated by the body should the shell rupture. We present a case wherein a patient's mammogram was read as negative two years prior to breast reaugmentation due to Baker IV capsular contracture. During surgery, complete calcification of the capsule was discovered, as well as two ruptured prostheses; neither condition had been detected by the mammogram. These capsules, with their calcifications and scar intact, were removed in toto and radiographically compared through standard silicone gel-filled breast implants and through implants containing the new biologically, osmotically, oncotically balanced gel. The calcifications were completely obscured by the silicone gel-filled prosthesis and completely visible when viewed through the bio-oncotic gel-filled prosthesis. Postoperative mammograms confirmed the radiolucency of the new gel-filled prostheses. This new gel appears to be a reasonable alternative to silicone gel for filling breast implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8273536     DOI: 10.1007/bf00437107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  11 in total

1.  Interrelationship of capsule thickness and breast hardness confirmed by a new measurement method.

Authors:  R A Ersek; J R Burroughs; C L Ersek; A Navarro
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  The effect of breast implants on the radiographic detection of microcalcification and soft-tissue masses.

Authors:  C A Gumucio; P Pin; V L Young; J Destouet; B Monsees; J Eichling
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Mammography after prosthesis placement for augmentation or reconstructive mammoplasty.

Authors:  D D Dershaw; T A Chaglassian
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Experiences with a large series of silastic breast implants.

Authors:  J E Williams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Rate and incidence of capsular contracture: a comparison of smooth and textured silicone double-lumen breast prostheses.

Authors:  R A Ersek
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Improved imaging of the augmented breast.

Authors:  G W Eklund; R C Busby; S H Miller; J S Job
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Radiolucent prosthetic gel.

Authors:  A A Beisang; R A Geise; R A Ersek
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  The relationship between breast cancer and augmentation mammaplasty: an epidemiologic study.

Authors:  D M Deapen; M C Pike; J T Casagrande; G S Brody
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Breast cancer in women after augmentation mammoplasty.

Authors:  M J Silverstein; N Handel; P Gamagami; J R Waisman; E D Gierson; R J Rosser; R Steyskal; W Colburn
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-06

10.  Mammography and breast implants.

Authors:  H Hayes; J Vandergrift; W C Diner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.