Literature DB >> 8273381

Endocrine-metabolic response to abdominal aortic surgery: a randomized trial of general anesthesia versus general plus epidural anesthesia.

H J Smeets1, J Kievit, F T Dulfer, J W van Kleef.   

Abstract

The influence of epidural anesthesia on the endocrine-metabolic response following abdominal aortic reconstruction was studied in a prospective randomized trial. Cortisol and catecholamine responses and nitrogen balance were measured in two groups of five patients receiving general anesthesia only (group 1) or general anesthesia combined with epidural bupivacaine (group 2). The study lasted from preoperatively until the first postoperative day. At 2100 hours on the day of surgery serum cortisol concentrations were higher in group 1 than in group 2 (1.41 versus 0.82 mumol/L; p < 0.01). Likewise the total perioperative hypercortisolemia, expressed as the area under the curve, was significantly higher in group 1 (11.7 versus 5.7 mumol/L/hr, p < 0.01). Intraoperative urinary excretion of epinephrine and postoperative norepinephrine excretion were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. Urinary excretion of free cortisol and cumulative nitrogen balance were not different between the groups. Although the number of patients was limited and the sensory nerve block level was not measured perioperatively, this study suggests that epidural anesthesia attenuates the stress response to aortic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8273381     DOI: 10.1007/bf01659119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  16 in total

1.  Combined epidural and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  J F Baron; M Bertrand; E Barré; G Godet; O Mundler; P Coriat; P Viars
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Regional anaesthesia and surgical morbidity.

Authors:  N B Scott; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Prognosis in acute organ-system failure.

Authors:  W A Knaus; E A Draper; D P Wagner; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Catecholamines in anesthetic and surgical stress.

Authors:  G P Zaloga
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  1988

5.  Hormonal blockade modifies post-traumatic protein catabolism.

Authors:  N Hulton; D J Johnson; R J Smith; D W Wilmore
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Effects of the extradural administration of morphine, or bupivacaine, on the endocrine response to upper abdominal surgery.

Authors:  H Rutberg; E Håkanson; B Anderberg; L Jorfeldt; J Mårtensson; B Schildt
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Effects of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on coagulation and outcome after major vascular surgery.

Authors:  K J Tuman; R J McCarthy; R J March; G A DeLaria; R V Patel; A D Ivankovich
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Role of the splanchnic nerves in endocrine and metabolic response to abdominal surgery.

Authors:  C Shirasaka; H Tsuji; T Asoh; Y Takeuchi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Effects of low-dose morphine and fentanyl infusions on urinary and plasma catecholamine concentrations during scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  K S Pathak; A H Anton; C A Sutheimer
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Multicenter prospective study of nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Part II. Variables predicting morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  K W Johnston
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  8 in total

1.  Physiologic responses to laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass grafting in an animal model.

Authors:  J Byrne; J W Hallett; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  A Rodgers; N Walker; S Schug; A McKee; H Kehlet; A van Zundert; D Sage; M Futter; G Saville; T Clark; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

Review 3.  The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practice.

Authors:  Robert J Moraca; David G Sheldon; Richard C Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Effects of different anesthetic techniques on serum leptin, C-reactive protein, and cortisol concentrations in anorectal surgery.

Authors:  Unase Buyukkocak; Cagatay Daphan; Osman Caglayan; Kuzey Aydinuraz; Tahsin Kaya; Oral Saygun; Fatih Agalar
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Inflammatory response markers in rats undergoing abdominal surgical procedures.

Authors:  Türkay Kirdak; Erdal Uysal; Efe Sezgin; Gülce Sevdar Cecen; Sinan Cavun
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-30

Review 6.  The benefits of adding epidural analgesia to general anesthesia: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Joanne Guay
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-05

Review 8.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.