Literature DB >> 8272756

Diagnostic performance and prognostic value of serum troponin T in suspected acute myocardial infarction.

J Ravkilde1, M Hørder, W Gerhardt, L Ljungdahl, T Pettersson, N Tryding, B H Møller, A Hamfelt, T Graven, A Asberg.   

Abstract

Cardiac troponin T (TnT) is a new serological marker for use as a diagnostic tool for myocardial damage. A blinded prospective multicentre study representing 298 patients suspected of having acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and admitted to the coronary care units of six Scandinavian Hospitals was undertaken to assess the diagnostic performance and prognostic efficacy of a new cardiospecific TnT immunoassay. We used a discriminator TnT value of 0.20 microgram l-1. One hundred and fifty five patients (52%) had definite AMI, based on WHO criteria (all had peak S-TnT values of > or = 0.20 micrograms l-1); 127 patients (43%) had ischaemic heart disease (IHD) without AMI; and 16 patients (5%) had non-IHD (all had peak S-TnT values of < 0.20 microgram l-1). The 127 IHD-patients without definite AMI could be subdivided into a group of 44 patients with S-TnT peak values of > or = 0.20 microgram l-1, and a group of 83 patients with TnT below this level. An equal identification of these patients among the centres was seen (mean +/- SD 35 +/- 13%; range 20-55%). A follow-up study was able to define the clinical significance of these findings. The cumulative 6 months probability of suffering cardiac death or AMI was significantly higher in the subgroup with increased TnT values (14% (6/44)) as compared to the other subgroup (4% (3/83)) (Log-rank test, p = 0.025). The probability of cardiac events was 15% for the patients with definite AMI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8272756     DOI: 10.3109/00365519309092571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac myofibrillar proteins: biochemical markers to estimate myocardial injury.

Authors:  K H Haider; W H Stimson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  Early radionuclide scans for risk assessment in suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S L Norris; L J Haywood; E Sobel; G L Hung; M deGuzman; M Siegel
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Prospective study of the role of cardiac troponin T in patients admitted with unstable angina.

Authors:  P Stubbs; P Collinson; D Moseley; T Greenwood; M Noble
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-03

4.  A prospective study of an algorithm using cardiac troponin I and myoglobin as adjuncts in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction and intermediate coronary syndromes in a veteran's hospital.

Authors:  A S Maisel; K Templin; M Love; P Clopton
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.882

5.  Identifying Patient Risk: The Basis for Rational Discharge Planning After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Utility of admission cardiac troponin and "Ischemia Modified Albumin" measurements for rapid evaluation and rule out of suspected acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department.

Authors:  P O Collinson; D C Gaze; K Bainbridge; F Morris; B Morris; A Price; S Goodacre
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Biochemical markers of myocardial injury.

Authors:  P K Nigam
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2007-03

8.  A serial follow up study of cardiac marker enzymes during the week after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Hitesh Shah; N Haridas
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2007-03

9.  Sources of diagnostic inaccuracy of conventional versus new diagnostic criteria for myocardial infarction in an unselected UK population with suspected cardiac chest pain, and investigation of independent prognostic variables.

Authors:  J Trevelyan; E W A Needham; S C H Smith; R K Mattu
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Biomarker Development in Cardiology: Reviewing the Past to Inform the Future.

Authors:  Katharine A Kott; Michael Bishop; Christina H J Yang; Toby M Plasto; Daniel C Cheng; Adam I Kaplan; Louise Cullen; David S Celermajer; Peter J Meikle; Stephen T Vernon; Gemma A Figtree
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.