Literature DB >> 8272425

Orientational sampling and rigid-body minimization in molecular docking.

E C Meng1, D A Gschwend, J M Blaney, I D Kuntz.   

Abstract

The biological activities of proteins depend on specific molecular recognition and binding. Computational methods for predicting binding modes can facilitate the discovery and design of ligands and yield information on the factors governing complementarity. The DOCK suite of programs has been applied to several systems; here, the degree of orientational sampling required to reproduce and identify known binding modes, with and without rigid-body energy minimization, is investigated for four complexes. There is a tradeoff between sampling and minimization. The known binding modes can be identified with intensive sampling alone (10,000 to 20,000 orientations generated per system) or with moderate sampling combined with minimization. Optimization improves energies significantly, particularly when steric clashes are present, and brings many orientations closer to the experimentally observed position. Whether or not minimization is performed, however, sampling must be sufficient to find at least one structure in the vicinity of the presumed true binding mode. Hybrid approaches combining docking and minimization are promising and will become more viable with the use of faster algorithms and the judicious selection of fewer orientations for minimization.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8272425     DOI: 10.1002/prot.340170305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  21 in total

1.  Statistical relationships among docking scores for different protein binding sites.

Authors:  R T Koehler; H O Villar
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  A comparative docking study and the design of potentially selective MMP inhibitors.

Authors:  S Hanessian; N Moitessier; E Therrien
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Gaussian mapping of chemical fragments in ligand binding sites.

Authors:  Kun Wang; Marta Murcia; Pere Constans; Carlos Pérez; Angel R Ortiz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  An improved adaptive genetic algorithm for protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  Ling Kang; Honglin Li; Hualiang Jiang; Xicheng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 5.  Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: a fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs.

Authors:  H J Böhm
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Orientational sampling and rigid-body minimization in molecular docking revisited: on-the-fly optimization and degeneracy removal.

Authors:  D A Gschwend; I D Kuntz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Active-site-directed 3D database searching: pharmacophore extraction and validation of hits.

Authors:  D E Clark; D R Westhead; R A Sykes; C W Murray
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Differential long-term regulation of TAS2R14 by structurally distinct agonists.

Authors:  Jung A Woo; Maria Castaño; Ashley Goss; Donghwa Kim; Eric M Lewandowski; Yu Chen; Stephen B Liggett
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Coregulator control of androgen receptor action by a novel nuclear receptor-binding motif.

Authors:  Katja Jehle; Laura Cato; Antje Neeb; Claudia Muhle-Goll; Nicole Jung; Emmanuel W Smith; Victor Buzon; Laia R Carbó; Eva Estébanez-Perpiñá; Katja Schmitz; Ljiljana Fruk; Burkhard Luy; Yu Chen; Marc B Cox; Stefan Bräse; Myles Brown; Andrew C B Cato
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  A biophysical elucidation for less toxicity of agglutinin than abrin-a from the seeds of Abrus precatorius in consequence of crystal structure.

Authors:  Jack Cheng; Tian-Huey Lu; Chao-Lin Liu; Jung-Yaw Lin
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 8.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.