Literature DB >> 8268634

Multichannel stimulation of phrenic nerves by epineural electrodes. Clinical experience and future developments.

W Mayr1, M Bijak, W Girsch, J Holle, H Lanmüller, H Thoma, M Zrunek.   

Abstract

Between 1983 and 1992, 23 patients with complete ventilatory insufficiency of differing etiologies were treated with an eight channel implant (Medimplant Inc., Vienna) for fatigue free stimulation of both phrenic nerves. Data for 15 patients with high spinal cord lesions (ages: 9-51 years) are summarized: 1) level of lesion: C0, 3 patients; C1/C2, 4; C2/C3, 8; 2) time between incident and implantation: 3-14 months; 3) diaphragm training: 1-22 months; 4) chronic pacing: 5-83 months; 5) tracheostomy closed: 7 patients; 6) living permanently at home: 13 patients; 7) respiratory rate per minute: 12-17; 8) duration of inspiration: 1.0-1.3 sec; 9) tidal volume: 7-20 ml/kg body weight; 10) volume per minute: 121-198 ml/kg body weight; 11) pH: 7.39-7.42; 12) pCO2: 22.9-38.6 mmHg; 13) pO2: 81.2-104.5 mmHg; and 14) died by December 1992, 4 patients. All currently available implants for phrenic pacing need an external power supply and radio control. The authors have developed and tested the first fully implantable device. Features of this implant include an electronic circuit based on the microcontroller MC68HC705C8; surface mounted technology (SMD); eight channels; constant current source adjustable to 5 mA in 256 steps, impulse duration: 100-1000 musec, stimulation frequency: 1-33 Hz; and minimum lifetime: 3 years. The implant is programmed via bidirectional radio transmission using an IBM compatible computer. The dimensions, including battery, eight electrode connectors, and antenna, are 67 x 48 x 13 mm. The implant weights 58 g. This new device may improve patients' safety and quality of life in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8268634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  3 in total

1.  Inspiratory muscle pacing in spinal cord injury: case report and clinical commentary.

Authors:  Anthony F DiMarco; Raymond P Onders; Anthony Ignagni; Krzysztof E Kowalski
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 2.  Evaluating the evidence: is phrenic nerve stimulation a safe and effective tool for decreasing ventilator dependence in patients with high cervical spinal cord injuries and central hypoventilation?

Authors:  Emily P Sieg; Russell A Payne; Sprague Hazard; Elias Rizk
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury respiratory care.

Authors:  Renata Jarosz; Meagan M Littlepage; Graham Creasey; Stephen L McKenna
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2012
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.