Literature DB >> 8267558

Genetic aspects of animal reasoning.

I I Poletaeva1, N V Popova, L G Romanova.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the investigations of Prof. L. V. Krushinsky and his colleagues into the genetics of complex behaviors in mammals. The ability of animals to extrapolate the direction of a food stimulus movement was investigated in wild and domesticated foxes (including different fur-color mutants), wild brown rats, and laboratory rats and mice. Wild animals (raised in the laboratory) were shown to be superior to their respective domesticated forms on performance of the extrapolation task, especially in their scores for the first presentation, in which no previous experience could be used. Laboratory rats and mice demonstrated a low level of extrapolation performance. This means that only a few laboratory animals were capable of solving the task, i.e., the percentage of correct solutions was equivalent to chance. The brain weight selection program resulted in two mice strains with a 20% (90-mg) difference in brain weight. Ability to solve the extrapolation task was present in low-brain weight mice in generations 7-11 but declined with further selection. Investigation of extrapolation ability in mice with different chromosomal anomalies demonstrated that animals with Robertsonian translocations Rb(8,17) 1lem and Rb(8,17) 6Sic were capable of solving this task in a statistically significant majority of cases, while mice with fusion of other chromosomes, as well as CBA normal karyotype mice, performed no better than expected by chance. Mice with two types of partial trisomies and animals homo- and heterozygous for translocations were also tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8267558     DOI: 10.1007/bf01067982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  6 in total

1.  Chromosomal repatterning--regularities and restrictions.

Authors:  M J White
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetical differences in complex behaviour of rodents [proceedings].

Authors:  I I Poletaeva; L G Romanova
Journal:  Act Nerv Super (Praha)       Date:  1977-09

3.  [Development of certain innate reflex reactions in mice selected for brain weight].

Authors:  N V Popova
Journal:  Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.437

4.  Effect of genotype and practice upon behavioral development in mice.

Authors:  J L Fuller; B H Herman
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Reflex-ontogeny and behavioural development of the mouse.

Authors:  W M Fox
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1965 Apr-Jul       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Differential effects of environmental enrichment on the open-field behavior of wild and domestic Norway rats.

Authors:  U W Huck; E O Price
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-10
  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Bypassing spermiogenesis for several generations does not have detrimental consequences on the fertility and neurobehavior of offspring: a study using the mouse.

Authors:  K L Tamashiro; Y Kimura; R J Blanchard; D C Blanchard; R Yanagimachi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Long-term effects of embryo freezing in mice.

Authors:  E Dulioust; K Toyama; M C Busnel; R Moutier; M Carlier; C Marchaland; B Ducot; P Roubertoux; M Auroux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Genotype-dependent characteristics of behavior in mice in cognitive tests. The effects of Noopept.

Authors:  A P Bel'nik; R U Ostrovskaya; I I Poletaeva
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17

4.  Selection of Mice for Object Permanence Cognitive Task Solution.

Authors:  Olga Viktorovna Perepelkina; Inga Igorevna Poletaeva
Journal:  Neurol Int       Date:  2022-08-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.