Literature DB >> 8265146

Clinical evaluation of a range of autorefractors.

G E McCaghrey1, F E Matthews.   

Abstract

A practice-based study of nine autorefractors was undertaken to assess reliability and validity. Various statistical methods were used to test aspects of validity of the machines compared with one another. In routine optometric practice the autorefractor is shown to be a useful complement to existing techniques, but there is a measurable difference in the performance of machines from different manufacturers, and even between two models from the same manufacturer.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8265146     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1993.tb00441.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  2 in total

1.  Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction in adults: comparison of the double-pass system, retinoscopy, subjective refraction and a table-mounted autorefractor.

Authors:  Meritxell Vilaseca; Montserrat Arjona; Jaume Pujol; Elvira Peris; Vanessa Martínez
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Repeatability of ARK-30 in a pediatric population.

Authors:  Laura Hernandez-Moreno; Ana Vallelado-Alvarez; Raul Martin
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.848

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.