OBJECTIVE: To rank playground surfaces with respect to impact attenuation under various simulated environmental conditions. DESIGN: An accelerometer was dropped from a height of 60 inches onto five different playground surfaces (wood chips, sand, gravel, grass, and commercial rubber mats). Impact attenuation was measured (in G forces) with the above surfaces dry, wet, and frozen. INTERVENTIONS: The accelerometer was dropped ten times onto each surface. All surfaces were tested in the wet, dry, and frozen states (saturated with water, then placed at -10 degrees C for 12 hours). RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed that wood chips significantly lowered impact forces compared with sand in the wet or dry condition and to grass or synthetic mats in the dry or frozen condition (p < 0.05). Wood chips absorbed the shock of impact significantly more than did gravel in the dry, frozen state. CONCLUSION: Wood chips appear to be the single best playground surface under a variety of environmental conditions when assessed by impact attenuation studies.
OBJECTIVE: To rank playground surfaces with respect to impact attenuation under various simulated environmental conditions. DESIGN: An accelerometer was dropped from a height of 60 inches onto five different playground surfaces (wood chips, sand, gravel, grass, and commercial rubber mats). Impact attenuation was measured (in G forces) with the above surfaces dry, wet, and frozen. INTERVENTIONS: The accelerometer was dropped ten times onto each surface. All surfaces were tested in the wet, dry, and frozen states (saturated with water, then placed at -10 degrees C for 12 hours). RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed that wood chips significantly lowered impact forces compared with sand in the wet or dry condition and to grass or synthetic mats in the dry or frozen condition (p < 0.05). Wood chips absorbed the shock of impact significantly more than did gravel in the dry, frozen state. CONCLUSION: Wood chips appear to be the single best playground surface under a variety of environmental conditions when assessed by impact attenuation studies.
Authors: Lara Joan Branson; John Latter; Gillian R Currie; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Tania Embree; Brent Edward Hagel Journal: Paediatr Child Health Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 2.253