PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome, patterns of failure and prognostic factors in this rare disease in adult patients treated at a single institution in the modern era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of all patients (389 cases) with soft tissue sarcoma in the extremities, torso (excluding retroperitoneum), and head and neck managed between 1980 and 1988 were reviewed. A curative (radical) approach was used in 321 patients of whom 10% were recurrent lesions. The local management consisted of surgery alone in 54 cases, surgery and radiotherapy in 250 and radiotherapy alone in 17. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used as a policy for high grade lesions in the initial five years of the study (98 cases), but was omitted subsequently. RESULTS: Extremity lesions fared more favourably compared to head and neck and torso lesions (p = 0.02) with respect to survival. Extremity and torso lesions had significantly better local control (p < 0.0001) than in the head and neck where local failure was a common cause of death. A multiple Cox regression analysis revealed that resection margins, local extension of tumor, age at diagnosis, and grade correlated with local relapse and distant relapse was also associated with local extension, high grade and in addition, large lesions. Size appeared especially predictive for distant failure, the most common cause of death. Distant failure was not influenced by the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients treated for recurrence in this series had significantly worse survival due to increased distant failure despite similar local control to primary cases. CONCLUSION: This series highlights the overall problem of distant failure in this disease. It also reaffirms the importance of obtaining local control both in the head and neck, where uncontrolled local disease is the major cause of death, and in general since local relapse appears to increase the risk of distant failure. It appears that the current staging systems should be reviewed in the light of the apparent effect of different prognostic factors.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome, patterns of failure and prognostic factors in this rare disease in adultpatients treated at a single institution in the modern era. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of all patients (389 cases) with soft tissue sarcoma in the extremities, torso (excluding retroperitoneum), and head and neck managed between 1980 and 1988 were reviewed. A curative (radical) approach was used in 321 patients of whom 10% were recurrent lesions. The local management consisted of surgery alone in 54 cases, surgery and radiotherapy in 250 and radiotherapy alone in 17. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used as a policy for high grade lesions in the initial five years of the study (98 cases), but was omitted subsequently. RESULTS: Extremity lesions fared more favourably compared to head and neck and torso lesions (p = 0.02) with respect to survival. Extremity and torso lesions had significantly better local control (p < 0.0001) than in the head and neck where local failure was a common cause of death. A multiple Cox regression analysis revealed that resection margins, local extension of tumor, age at diagnosis, and grade correlated with local relapse and distant relapse was also associated with local extension, high grade and in addition, large lesions. Size appeared especially predictive for distant failure, the most common cause of death. Distant failure was not influenced by the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients treated for recurrence in this series had significantly worse survival due to increased distant failure despite similar local control to primary cases. CONCLUSION: This series highlights the overall problem of distant failure in this disease. It also reaffirms the importance of obtaining local control both in the head and neck, where uncontrolled local disease is the major cause of death, and in general since local relapse appears to increase the risk of distant failure. It appears that the current staging systems should be reviewed in the light of the apparent effect of different prognostic factors.
Authors: Thomas Brodowicz; Gabriele Amann; Andreas Leithner; Arpad Sztankay; Franz Kainberger; Wolfgang Eisterer; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Franz Rachbauer; Thomas Rath; Michael Bergmann; Philipp T Funovics; Ferdinand Ploner; Reinhard Windhager Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: C V Sole; F A Calvo; M Cambeiro; A Polo; A Montero; R Hernanz; C Gonzalez; M Cuervo; D Perez; M S Julian; R Martinez-Monge Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Gregory G Kolovich; Adam N Wooldridge; Jonathan M Christy; Martha K Crist; Joel L Mayerson; Thomas J Scharschmidt Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2011-05-07 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Brian O'Sullivan; Patrick Gullane; Jonathan Irish; Peter Neligan; Fred Gentili; James Mahoney; Susanna Sellmann; Charles Catton; John Waldron; Dale Brown; Ian Witterick; Jeremy Freeman; Robert Bell Journal: World J Surg Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.352