Literature DB >> 8262683

Altered homologous and heterologous gap-junctional intercellular communication in primary human liver tumors associated with aberrant protein localization but not gene mutation of connexin 32.

V Krutovskikh1, G Mazzoleni, N Mironov, Y Omori, A M Aguelon, M Mesnil, F Berger, C Partensky, H Yamasaki.   

Abstract

Gap-junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) in 20 primary human liver tumors with different degrees of malignancy has been studied at the functional and molecular levels. When GJIC capacity was determined by dye-transfer assay performed directly with freshly removed tumor tissue, significant reduction was found in all samples, regardless of their morphology. In addition, a selective lack of GJIC between tumor and surrounding non-tumorous cells was observed in some cases, probably due to the physical separation between them resulting from encapsulation of tumors. There was, however, no essential change in the level of expression of the major liver gap-junction protein, connexin (cx) 32, in liver tumors as measured by Northern and Western blot analyses. Immunohistochemical study revealed aberrant localization of cx 32 in the majority of malignant liver tumors. Instead of cytoplasmic membrane localization at intercellular contacts, cx 32 was detected mainly either intracytoplasmically or in plasma membrane free from contact with other cells. We did not detect any mutation in the coding sequence of the cx 32 gene from any of the human liver tumors we tested. Thus it is likely that the aberrant localization of cx 32 in tumor cells is due to disruption of the mechanisms for establishment of this protein into gap-junction plaques, rather than to structural abnormality of the cx 32 protein itself. Another member of the connexin family, cx 43, not detectable in non-tumorigenic hepatocytes, was expressed in several tumors, especially in invasive areas, but was detected in only a few tumor cells and was localized intracytoplasmically, suggesting that cx 43 protein is not involved in GJIC in the tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8262683     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910560116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  44 in total

1.  Changes in connexin43 expression and localization during pancreatic cancer progression.

Authors:  Joell L Solan; Sunil R Hingorani; Paul D Lampe
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 2.  Liver repopulation and carcinogenesis: two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  Fabio Marongiu; Silvia Doratiotto; Stefania Montisci; Paolo Pani; Ezio Laconi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Connexin 26 correlates with Bcl-xL and Bax proteins expression in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Luiza Kanczuga-Koda; Stanislaw Sulkowski; Mariusz Koda; Elzbieta Skrzydlewska; Mariola Sulkowska
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Increased expression of connexins 26 and 43 in lymph node metastases of breast cancer.

Authors:  L Kanczuga-Koda; S Sulkowski; A Lenczewski; M Koda; A Wincewicz; M Baltaziak; M Sulkowska
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Identification of amino acid sequence motifs in desmocollin, a desmosomal glycoprotein, that are required for plakoglobin binding and plaque formation.

Authors:  S M Troyanovsky; R B Troyanovsky; L G Eshkind; R E Leube; W W Franke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Expression and significance of Cx43 and E-cadherin in gastric cancer and metastatic lymph nodes.

Authors:  Bo Tang; Zhi-Hong Peng; Pei-Wu Yu; Ge Yu; Feng Qian
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Connexin 32 mutations from X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease patients: functional defects and dominant negative effects.

Authors:  Y Omori; M Mesnil; H Yamasaki
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  Are gap junction gene connexins 26, 32 and 43 of prognostic values in hepatocellular carcinoma? A prospective study.

Authors:  I-Shyan Sheen; Kuo-Shyang Jeng; Po-Chuan Wang; Shou-Chuan Shih; Wen-Hsing Chang; Horng-Yuan Wang; Chung-Chu Chen; Li-Rung Shyung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  The role of altered cell-cell communication in melanoma progression.

Authors:  Nikolas K Haass; Keiran S M Smalley; Meenhard Herlyn
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.611

10.  Connexin43 reduces melanoma growth within a keratinocyte microenvironment and during tumorigenesis in vivo.

Authors:  Mark J Ableser; Silvia Penuela; Jack Lee; Qing Shao; Dale W Laird
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.