Literature DB >> 8262077

Effect of atrial fibrillation on pulmonary venous flow patterns: transoesophageal pulsed Doppler echocardiographic study.

W D Ren1, P Visentin, G L Nicolosi, F A Canterin, V Dall'Aglio, C Lestuzzi, R Mimo, D Pavan, L Sparacino, E Cervesato.   

Abstract

The effect of atrial fibrillation on pulmonary venous flow patterns is still not well known. Twenty-four patients in atrial fibrillation and 21 patients in sinus rhythm were studied by transoesophageal echocardiography. In ninety-five percent (20/21) of sinus rhythm patients, the early systolic wave due to atrial relaxation or reverse wave due to atrial contraction could be distinguished on pulsed Doppler tracings by transoesophageal echocardiography. However, there was no early systolic wave and/or reverse at the end of diastole in any atrial fibrillation patients. In atrial fibrillation patients without mitral regurgitation (n = 14), the onset of systolic flow was delayed (165 +/- 38 vs 50 +/- 46 ms, P < 0.05), and systolic peak velocities, time-velocity integrals and systolic fractions were reduced (31 +/- 13 vs 54 +/- 17 cm.s-1, P < 0.05; 5 +/- 2 vs 13 +/- 6 cm, P < 0.05 and 36 +/- 8 vs 61 +/- 15%, P < 0.05, respectively) as compared to those in sinus rhythm. Significant mitral regurgitation (n = 10) reduced systolic velocity parameters considerably in atrial fibrillation patients but the diastolic flow parameters were not significantly different between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation patients. Stepwise multiple regression analysis identified atrial fibrillation as an important independent predictor for changes in systolic flow parameters. The R-R interval is also an important factor for diastolic flow parameters. Thus, the present study demonstrates that atrial fibrillation significantly modifies pulmonary venous flow pattern and is an important factor for systolic flow parameters. Significant mitral regurgitation can further modify systolic flow pattern in atrial fibrillation patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8262077     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/14.10.1320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  5 in total

Review 1.  Impact of common rhythm disturbances on echocardiographic measurements and interpretation.

Authors:  Daniel A Gomes; Rita Reis Santos; Pedro Freitas; Mariana Sousa Paiva; João Abecasis; Maria Salomé Carvalho; Frank A Flachskampf; Maria João Andrade
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 6.138

2.  Left Atrial Diastolic Dysfunction And Pulmonary Venous Hypertension In Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical, Hemodynamic And Echocardiographic Characteristics.

Authors:  Thomas J Heywood; Srikanth Seethala; Tariq Khan; Allen Johnson; Michael Smith; David Rubenson; Eric Reynolds
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-10-31

3.  Correlation between N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Doppler Echocardiographic Parameters of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Woo Shin Kim; Seong-Hoon Park
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-03-31

4.  Transesophageal echocardiography: a follow-up tool after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and interventional therapy of pulmonary vein stenosis and occlusion.

Authors:  Carsten Schneider; Sabine Ernst; Rainer Malisius; Edda Bahlmann; Friedrun Lampe; Thomas Broemel; Korff Krause; Sigrid Boczor; Matthias Antz; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Comparison of transthoracic echocardiography with computed tomography in evaluation of pulmonary veins.

Authors:  Qing-Qing Dong; Wen-Yi Yang; Ya-Ping Sun; Qian Zhang; Guang Chu; Gen-Qing Zhou; Gang Chen; Song-Wen Chen; Shao-Wen Liu; Fang Wang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.