Literature DB >> 8261405

A randomized phase I trial of chronic oral etoposide with or without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced malignancies.

D W Shaffer1, L S Smith, H A Burris, G M Clark, J R Eckardt, S M Fields, G R Weiss, D A Rinaldi, K J Bowen, J G Kuhn.   

Abstract

Data from an in vitro human tumor-cloning assay suggested synergistic cytotoxicity when etoposide (VP16) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were combined. To explore this potential, we undertook a prospectively randomized three-arm trial in a phase I setting with various schedules of VP16 and GM-CSF. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in the three-arm trial. Arm A consisted of oral VP16 daily for up to 21 days with cycles repeated every 35 days. Arm B included oral VP16 daily for up to 21 days plus concomitant GM-CSF at 5 micrograms/kg/day s.c. days 1-10. Arm C included oral VP16 daily for up to 21 days plus pretreatment with GM-CSF at the same dose for 5 days (days -6 to -2). VP16 was begun at 25 mg/m2/day on level 1 and increased to 50 mg/m2/day on level 2. Twenty-seven patients were evaluable for toxicity, nine on each arm (six patients on each arm on level 1, three patients on each arm on level 2). Neutropenia on arm B (concomitant VP16 and GM-CSF) was earlier and more profound than on arm A or C. The median absolute neutrophil count and day of nadir for arms A, B, and C were 3295, 988, and 1600/mm3 and days 23, 15, and 26, respectively. Thrombocytopenia was generally uncommon except on arm C level 2, where the median platelet count was 26,000/mm3. One partial response (arm B) in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer was seen. Dose intensity favored arm A. Neither concomitant therapy with VP16 and GM-CSF (arm B) nor pretreatment with GM-CSF (arm C) improved dose intensity over VP16 alone (arm A), and arms B and C were complicated by increased neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8261405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  6 in total

1.  Intra-arterial cisplatin plus oral etoposide for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: a phase II study.

Authors:  L S Ashby; W R Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Peripheral blood progenitor cell cycle kinetics following priming with pIXY321 in patients treated with the "ICE" regimen.

Authors:  J R Murren; A Gollerkeri; S Anderson; S Lutzker; S Del Prete; D Zelterman; L Garrison; B Smith
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

4.  Co-administration of dexamethasone increases severity and accelerates onset day of neutropenia in bladder cancer patients on methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shingo Itai; Yukio Suga; Yusuke Hara; Kouji Izumi; Yuji Maeda; Yasuhide Kitagawa; Junko Ishizaki; Tsutomu Shimada; Atsushi Mizokami; Yoshimichi Sai
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2017-01-11

5.  Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor augments lymphokine-activated killer activity from pleural cavity mononuclear cells of lung cancer patients without malignant effusion.

Authors:  K Takahashi; S Sone; S Saito; Y Kamamura; T Uyama; T Ogura; Y Monden
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1995-09

Review 6.  Temozolomide and oral etoposide in children with recurrent malignant brain tumors.

Authors:  Antonio Ruggiero; Anna Ariano; Silvia Triarico; Michele Antonio Capozza; Alberto Romano; Palma Maurizi; Stefano Mastrangelo; Giorgio Attinà
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2020-06-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.