Literature DB >> 8260608

Activation of precentral and mesial motor areas during the execution of elementary proximal and distal arm movements: a PET study.

M Matelli1, G Rizzolatti, V Bettinardi, M C Gilardi, D Perani, G Rizzo, F Fazio.   

Abstract

Regional cerebral blood flow was measured using positron emission tomography (PET) in normal subjects while performing simple aimless proximal and distal arm movements. The aim of the experiment was to compare the somatotopic organization of precentral and mesial (the so called supplementary motor area, SMA) motor cortices and to evaluate whether in man, as in the monkey, the rostral and caudal sectors of SMA are functionally different. The results showed that proximal and distal arm movements are to a large extent segregated in the precentral motor cortex, but not in the SMA. They also showed that the SMA is made of at least two functional sectors. Only the caudal one is activated during simple aimless movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8260608     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199309150-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  14 in total

1.  Activation of frontal premotor areas during suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left primary sensorimotor cortex: a glucose metabolic PET study.

Authors:  H Siebner; M Peller; P Bartenstein; F Willoch; C Rossmeier; M Schwaiger; B Conrad
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Motor representation of the hand in the human cortex: an f-MRI study with a conventional 1.5 T clinical unit.

Authors:  A Beltramello; R Cerini; G Puppini; G El-Dalati; S Viola; E Martone; D Cordopatri; M Manfredi; S Aglioti; G Tassinari
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-10

3.  Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints.

Authors:  Andreas R Luft; Gerald V Smith; Larry Forrester; Jill Whitall; Richard F Macko; Till-Karsten Hauser; Andrew P Goldberg; Daniel F Hanley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The neural response to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. I. Intracortical and cortico-cortical contributions.

Authors:  Ysbrand D Van Der Werf; Tomás Paus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Preparatory band specific premotor cortical activity differentiates upper and lower extremity movement.

Authors:  Lewis A Wheaton; Mackenzie Carpenter; J C Mizelle; Larry Forrester
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Functional neuroimaging correlates of finger-tapping task variations: an ALE meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suzanne T Witt; Angela R Laird; M Elizabeth Meyerand
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; L Fadiga; M Matelli; V Bettinardi; E Paulesu; D Perani; F Fazio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  C A Porro; M P Francescato; V Cettolo; M E Diamond; P Baraldi; C Zuiani; M Bazzocchi; P E di Prampero
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control.

Authors:  D P Carey; E L Hargreaves; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The neural response to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. II. Thalamocortical contributions.

Authors:  Ysbrand D Van Der Werf; Abbas F Sadikot; Antonio P Strafella; Tomás Paus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.