Literature DB >> 8260501

Mutational analysis of the pea phytochrome A chromophore pocket: chromophore assembly with apophytochrome A and photoreversibility.

L Deforce1, M Furuya, P S Song.   

Abstract

Ten site-specific mutants of pea apophytochrome A were expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and analyzed for chromophore assembly with apoprotein and photoreversible absorbance changes. The mutants constitute two specific changes for each of five conserved amino acid residues located in the microenvironment of the chromophore attachment residue, which is Cys-323 in pea phytochrome A. All mutant apophytochromes were autocatalytically able to covalently attach phycocyanobilin, indicating that there were no major structural perturbations in the apoproteins. However, the rate of chromophore ligation varied significantly among the mutants. Spectrally, the mutant holophytochromes are of three types: mutant phytochromes that are indistinguishable from the wild-type adduct, mutants with blue-shifted Pr and Pfr absorption maxima compared to the wild-type adduct, and mutants that are not photoreversible. From an analysis of the results, we concluded that the residues Asp-309, Arg-318, His-321, and Gln-326 are probably not catalytically involved in the chromophore ligation reaction, but some residues may play significant structural and stereochemical roles. Arg-318 might anchor the chromophore, as has been suggested [Partis, M. D., & Grimm, R. (1990) Z. Naturforsch, 45c, 987-998; Parker, W., et al. (1993) Bioconjugate Chem. (in press)]. The conserved Gln-326, three residues downstream from the chromophore attachment site, is not electrostatically critical for the spectral integrity and photoreversibility of phytochrome, but this residue is sterically important to the lyase activity. It appears that the role of the five amino acid residues in the N- and C-terminal vicinities of the chromophore binding Cys-323 is structural rather than catalytic for the ligation reaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8260501     DOI: 10.1021/bi00214a014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  7 in total

1.  In vitro assembly of phytochrome B apoprotein with synthetic analogs of the phytochrome chromophore.

Authors:  H Hanzawa; K Inomata; H Kinoshita; T Kakiuchi; K P Jayasundera; D Sawamoto; A Ohta; K Uchida; K Wada; M Furuya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Evolutionary studies illuminate the structural-functional model of plant phytochromes.

Authors:  Sarah Mathews
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 3.  Initial events in phytochrome signalling: still in the dark.

Authors:  T D Elich; J Chory
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Catalytic mechanism of S-type phycobiliprotein lyase: chaperone-like action and functional amino acid residues.

Authors:  Michaela Kupka; Juan Zhang; Wei-Lei Fu; Jun-Ming Tu; Stephan Böhm; Ping Su; Yu Chen; Ming Zhou; Hugo Scheer; Kai-Hong Zhao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris synthesizes a functionally active chromophore precursor of the plant photoreceptor phytochrome.

Authors:  S H Wu; J C Lagarias
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The structure and function of phytochrome A: the roles of the entire molecule and of its various parts.

Authors:  K Manabe; M Nakazawa
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.000

7.  Mutant screen distinguishes between residues necessary for light-signal perception and signal transfer by phytochrome B.

Authors:  Yoshito Oka; Tomonao Matsushita; Nobuyoshi Mochizuki; Peter H Quail; Akira Nagatani
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.917

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.