Literature DB >> 8260372

A randomised study of carboplatin vs sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin for patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The London Gynaecologic Oncology Group.

T J Perren1, E Wiltshaw, P Harper, M Slevin, R Stein, S Tan, M Gore, I J Fryatt, P R Blake.   

Abstract

In a study designed to compare response rates of patients with stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma to ifosfamide and carboplatin, 152 patients were randomised to receive either sequential therapy with three cycles of ifosfamide followed by three cycles of carboplatin, or to six cycles of single agent carboplatin. Ifosfamide was given every 3 weeks in a dose of 5 gm m-2 as a 24 h infusion with mesna, 1 gm m-2 by i.v. bolus prior to ifosfamide, 3 gm m-2 with ifosfamide, and 1 gm m-2 as an 8 h infusion after ifosfamide. Carboplatin was given in a dose of 400 mg m-2 by short i.v. infusion every 4 weeks. Sixty-eight evaluable patients were randomised to sequential ifosfamide/carboplatin, and 67 to single agent carboplatin. Median follow-up is 36 months (range 5.5-82.3). After three cycles of treatment two patients in the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm achieved complete remission (CR), and 12 partial remission (PR) for an overall response rate of 29%, whereas in the carboplatin arm ten patients achieved CR, and 23 PR, for an overall response rate of 63% (P = 0.0008). Seven of 15 patients with progressive disease, and nine of 20 patients with stable disease at the initial response evaluation, following three cycles of ifosfamide, subsequently responded to carboplatin therapy so that the final response rate to the complete regimen was 65% for the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm, compared to 71% for the carboplatin arm (NS). For the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm, median recurrence free survival and overall survival were 14.1 months and 18.7 months. Corresponding figures for the carboplatin arm were 14.5 months and 21.5 months (NS). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. However 47% of patients in the ifosfamide/carboplatin arm developed alopecia sufficient to require a wig, compared to only 2% in the carboplatin arm. Ifosfamide is clearly less effective, and more toxic than carboplatin. Ifosfamide failures can however be effectively salvaged by subsequent carboplatin treatment. Ifosfamide cannot be recommended for single agent therapy in ovarian carcinoma, however the combination of carboplatin plus ifosfamide might be a suitable treatment to be tested in a future randomised study against carboplatin alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8260372      PMCID: PMC1968655          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  23 in total

1.  Unexpected toxicity in patients treated with iphosphamide.

Authors:  J J Van Dyk; H C Falkson; A M Van der Merwe; G Falkson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  High-dose platinum for the treatment of refractory ovarian cancer.

Authors:  H W Bruckner; R Wallach; C J Cohen; G Deppe; B Kabakow; L Ratner; J F Holland
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Phase II study of cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II) (NSC-119875) in advanced adenocarcinoma of the ovary.

Authors:  E Wiltshaw; T Kroner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1976-01

4.  Evaluation of a cooperative clinical study of the cytostatic agent ifosfamide.

Authors:  J Schnitker; N Brock; H Burkert; E Fichtner
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1976

5.  Results obtained with fractionated ifosfamide massive-dose treatment in generalized malignant tumours.

Authors:  P Brühl; U Günther; H Hoefer-Janker; W Hüls; W Scheef; W Vahlensieck
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm       Date:  1976-07

6.  Cancer of the ovary: a summary of experience with cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II) at the Royal Marsden Hospital.

Authors:  E Wiltshaw; S Subramarian; C Alexopoulos; G H Barker
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1979 Sep-Oct

7.  Phase II study of JM8, a new platinum analog, in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  B D Evans; K S Raju; A H Calvert; S J Harland; E Wiltshaw
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1983-11

8.  A randomized comparison of melphalan versus melphalan plus hexamethylmelamine versus adriamycin plus cyclophosphamide in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  G A Omura; C P Morrow; J A Blessing; A Miller; H J Buchsbaum; H D Homesley; L Leone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prevention of isophosphamide-induced urothelial toxicity with 2-mercaptoethane sulphonate sodium (mesnum) in patients with advanced carcinoma.

Authors:  B M Bryant; M Jarman; H T Ford; I E Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-09-27       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Single-agent paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer. London Gynaecological Oncology and North Thames Gynaecological Oncology Groups.

Authors:  M E Gore; G Rustin; M Slevin; C Gallagher; R Penson; R Osborne; J Ledermann; T Cameron; J M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.