Literature DB >> 8260357

In vivo therapeutic potential of combination thiol depletion and alkylating chemotherapy.

D W Siemann1, K L Beyers.   

Abstract

The effect of administering the thiol modulating agent buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) in conjunction with alkylating chemotherapy was investigated in vivo in the mouse KHT sarcomas and bone marrow stem cells. Tumour response to treatment was assessed by an in vivo to in vitro excision assay and bone marrow survival was determined in vitro by CFU-GM. Glutathione (GSH) depletion and recovery kinetics were determined at various times after treatment using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) techniques. Following a single 2.5 mmol kg-1 dose of BSO, tumour GSH reached a nadir of approximately 40% of control 12-16 h after treatment. Bone marrow GSH was depleted to approximately 45% of control 4-8 h after treatment but recovered to normal by 16 h. When a range of doses of CCNU, mitomycin C, cyclophosphamide or melphalan (MEL) were given 16 h after mice were exposed to a 2.5 mmol kg-1 dose of BSO, only the antitumour efficacy of MEL was effectively enhanced (by a factor of approximately 1.4). This BSO-MEL combination appeared to be selective for the tumour as the bone marrow toxicity was not increased beyond that seen for MEL alone. Since increasing the administered dose of BSO neither increased the extent of thiol depletion in the tumour nor enhanced the antitumour efficacy of MEL, three other protocols for delivering the thiol depletor were explored. BSO was given either as multiple 2.5 mmol kg-1 doses administered at 6 or 16 h intervals or continuously at a concentration of 30 mM supplied in the animals' drinking water. Both multi-dose BSO pretreatments were found to increase both the antitumour efficacy and normal tissue toxicity of MEL such that no advantage compared to the single dose combination was achieved. In contrast, maintaining the thiol depletor in the drinking water led to an approximately 1.7-fold increase in the antitumour efficacy of MEL without any corresponding increase in bone marrow stem cell toxicity. For the various pretreatment strategies it was possible, in all cases, to account for the presence or absence of a net therapeutic benefit on the basis of the tumour and bone marrow GSH depletion and recovery kinetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8260357      PMCID: PMC1968664          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  28 in total

1.  An in vitro assay to measure the viability of KHT tumor cells not previously exposed to culture conditions.

Authors:  J E Thomson; A M Rauth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Augmentation of adriamycin, melphalan, and cisplatin cytotoxicity in drug-resistant and -sensitive human ovarian carcinoma cell lines by buthionine sulfoximine mediated glutathione depletion.

Authors:  T C Hamilton; M A Winker; K G Louie; G Batist; B C Behrens; T Tsuruo; K R Grotzinger; W M McKoy; R C Young; R F Ozols
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 5.858

3.  Reduction in glutathione content of L-PAM resistant L1210 Cells confers drug sensitivity.

Authors:  K Suzukake; B J Petro; D T Vistica
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1982-01-01       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 4.  Glutathione metabolism as a determinant of therapeutic efficacy: a review.

Authors:  B A Arrick; C F Nathan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Glutathione depletion in tissues after administration of buthionine sulphoximine.

Authors:  A I Minchinton; A Rojas; K A Smith; J A Soranson; D C Shrieve; N R Jones; J C Bremner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Altered mouse bone marrow glutathione and glutathione transferase levels in response to cytotoxins.

Authors:  K J Adams; J Carmichael; C R Wolf
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Heterogeneity in the radiation survival curves and biochemical properties of human lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  G Morstyn; A Russo; D N Carney; E Karawya; S H Wilson; J B Mitchell
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  The role of thiols in cellular response to radiation and drugs.

Authors:  J E Biaglow; M E Varnes; E P Clark; E R Epp
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Glutathione depletion as a determinant of sensitivity of human leukemia cells to cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  T R Crook; R L Souhami; G D Whyman; A E McLean
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Selective modification of glutathione metabolism.

Authors:  A Meister
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Clinically Evaluated Cancer Drugs Inhibiting Redox Signaling.

Authors:  D Lynn Kirkpatrick; Garth Powis
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Cytotoxic 2-benzylidene-6-(nitrobenzylidene)cyclohexanones which display substantially greater toxicity for neoplasms than non-malignant cells.

Authors:  Umashankar Das; Alireza Doroudi; H Inci Gul; Hari N Pati; Masami Kawase; Hiroshi Sakagami; Qing Chu; James P Stables; Jonathan R Dimmock
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Striking LD50 variation associated with fluctuations of CYP2E1-positive cells in hepatic lobule during chronic CCl4 exposure in mice.

Authors:  Hiroshi Irie; Anshin Asano-Hoshino; Yoshihisa Sekino; Makoto Nogami; Tomoyuki Kitagawa; Hiroaki Kanda
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Cytotoxicity of antitumor platinum complexes with L-buthionine-(R,S)-sulfoximine and/or etanidazole in human carcinoma cell lines sensitive and resistant to cisplatin.

Authors:  S E Brooks; T T Korbut; N P Dupuis; S A Holden; B A Teicher
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  PKCα Inhibition as a Strategy to Sensitize Neuroblastoma Stem Cells to Etoposide by Stimulating Ferroptosis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Monteleone; Andrea Speciale; Giulia Elda Valenti; Nicola Traverso; Silvia Ravera; Ombretta Garbarino; Riccardo Leardi; Emanuele Farinini; Antonella Roveri; Fulvio Ursini; Claudia Cantoni; Maria Adelaide Pronzato; Umberto Maria Marinari; Barbara Marengo; Cinzia Domenicotti
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28

6.  Influence of O6-benzylguanine on the anti-tumour activity and normal tissue toxicity of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea and molecular combinations of 5-fluorouracil and 2-chloroethyl-1-nitrosourea in mice.

Authors:  M C Bibby; M J Thompson; J A Rafferty; G P Margison; R S McElhinney
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  A Phase I New Approaches to Neuroblastoma Therapy Study of Buthionine Sulfoximine and Melphalan With Autologous Stem Cells for Recurrent/Refractory High-Risk Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Judith G Villablanca; Samuel L Volchenboum; Hwangeui Cho; Min H Kang; Susan L Cohn; Clarke P Anderson; Araz Marachelian; Susan Groshen; Denice Tsao-Wei; Katherine K Matthay; John M Maris; Charlotte E Hasenauer; Scarlett Czarnecki; Hollie Lai; Fariba Goodarzian; Hiro Shimada; Charles Patrick Reynolds
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  The effect of monohydroxyethylrutoside on doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in patients treated for metastatic cancer in a phase II study.

Authors:  A M E Bruynzeel; H W M Niessen; J G F Bronzwaer; J J M van der Hoeven; J Berkhof; A Bast; W J F van der Vijgh; C J van Groeningen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Building on Cram's legacy: stimulated gating in hemicarcerands.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Roger C Helgeson; K N Houk
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 22.384

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.