Literature DB >> 8260219

General practice workload during normal working hours in training and non-training practices.

C Martin-Bates1, M Agass, A J Tulloch.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to design and test a form to review workload in training and non-training practices. The study was conducted in the Oxford, Reading and Milton Keynes districts over a period of one week and involved 31 training and 21 non-training practices consisting of 156 and 66 doctors, respectively. Doctors in training practices (excluding trainees) spent a mean of one hour less per week in contact with their patients than doctors in non-training practices. Doctors in training practices spent approximately the same time per week on administration as those in non-training practices, one hour more in both meetings and non-practice work and almost two hours more in training and studying. The mean total practice workload per doctor in training practices was two hours more than in non-training practices and, when non-practice work was included, the difference increased to three hours. Compared with other doctors, trainees saw fewer patients in the surgery, in clinics and on visits, but spent more time on studying and training. This study produced broadly similar results to previous surveys, although doctors in the present study saw fewer patients each week and spent more time with each patient than in other studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8260219      PMCID: PMC1372587     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  5 in total

1.  A further study of trainee general practitioners.

Authors:  I M Richardson; J G Howie; J S Berkeley
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1974-09

2.  List size and patient contact in general medical practice.

Authors:  D Wilkin; D H Metcalfe
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-01

3.  A comparison of the practice activities of trainees and principals.

Authors:  D M Fleming
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1986-05

4.  Patterns of work in general practice in the Bromley health district.

Authors:  D Armstrong; G A Griffin
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-06

5.  Seasonal variations in the process of care in urban general practice.

Authors:  L Hallam; D H Metcalfe
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.710

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  Relationship between new and return consultations and workload in general practice.

Authors:  J Bain
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  A healthy disposition? The use and limitations of the characteristics approach to general practice research.

Authors:  D L Baines
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Undergraduate teaching in UK general practice: a geographical snapshot.

Authors:  Helen Derbyshire; Eliot Rees; Simon P Gay; Robert K McKinley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Opinions of general practitioners in Nottinghamshire about provision of intrapartum care.

Authors:  D J Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24

5.  Are family practice trainers and their host practices any better? Comparing practice trainers and non-trainers and their practices.

Authors:  Pieter van den Hombergh; Saskia Schalk-Soekar; Anneke Kramer; Ben Bottema; Stephen Campbell; Jozé Braspenning
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Patient complaint cases in primary health care: what are the characteristics of general practitioners involved?

Authors:  Søren Birkeland; Rene dePont Christensen; Niels Damsbo; Jakob Kragstrup
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Comparison of French training and non-training general practices: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Laurent Letrilliart; Pauline Rigault-Fossier; Benoit Fossier; Nadir Kellou; Françoise Paumier; Christophe Bois; Stéphanie Polazzi; Anne-Marie Schott; Yves Zerbib
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.