Literature DB >> 8259399

Aortic cobwebs: an anatomic marker identifying the false lumen in aortic dissection--imaging and pathologic correlation.

D M Williams1, A Joshi, M D Dake, G M Deeb, D C Miller, G D Abrams.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and estimate the frequency of fibroelastic cords or bands projecting from the false lumen wall ("aortic cobwebs") in acute and chronic dissections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pathologic specimens (n = 23), routine magnetic resonance (MR) images (n = 27), and intravascular (n = 5) and transesophageal (n = 3) ultrasound (US) images from 43 patients with aortic dissection were reviewed, and the presence and configuration of cobwebs were noted.
RESULTS: Aortic cobwebs usually bridge the junction of the dissection flap with the outer wall of the false lumen (the line of dissection) but occasionally project like small tendrils from the false lumen wall remote from the line of dissection. Cobwebs were found in 17 of 23 pathologic specimens and on six of 27 MR images, two of five intravascular US scans, and one of three transesophageal US scans.
CONCLUSION: Aortic cobwebs most likely represent residual ribbons of media that have been incompletely sheared from the aortic wall during the dissection process. As such, they can serve as an anatomic marker of the false lumen. They are occasionally seen on routine aortic images and may, therefore, prove useful for orientation during percutaneous or surgical interventional procedures to relieve ischemic complications of aortic dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8259399     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.190.1.8259399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of aortic dissection by helical computed tomography (CT).

Authors:  Serge Willoteaux; Christophe Lions; Virginia Gaxotte; Ziad Negaiwi; J P Beregi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Three-Channeled Aortic Dissection in a Patient without Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Yoshie Inoue Arita; Koichi Akutsu; Takeshi Yamamoto; Yusuke Hosokawa; Masahiro Fujii; Takashi Nitta; Wataru Shimizu
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.520

3.  Multislice CT virtual intravascular endoscopy of aortic dissection: A pictorial essay.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Yan Cao
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-28

4.  MDCT in diagnosing acute aortic syndromes: reviewing common and less common CT findings.

Authors:  T Valente; G Rossi; F Lassandro; M Marino; G Tortora; R Muto; M Scaglione
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Aortic cobweb sign.

Authors:  Daniel Chen; Felipe Matsunaga
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-02-18

Review 6.  [Imaging of aortic disease].

Authors:  P Reimer; R Vosshenrich; P Landwehr; M Storck
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Clinics in diagnostic imaging (182). Acute descending aortic dissection with aortic root retrograde extension.

Authors:  John Nathan Gifford; Angeline Choo Choo Poh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 8.  Multi-detector computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of acute aortic syndromes.

Authors:  James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan; Gopinathan Anil
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28

Review 9.  MRI in Chronic Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andrew G Sherrah; Stuart M Grieve; Richmond W Jeremy; Paul G Bannon; Michael P Vallely; Rajesh Puranik
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-02-19

10.  Pictorial essay: Computed tomography findings in acute aortic syndromes.

Authors:  Navdeep Singh; Pankaj Goel; Yadwinder Singh
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.