Literature DB >> 8258004

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation preferences in the elderly.

S T O'Keeffe1, J Noel, J N Lavan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many studies have examined the attitudes of elderly Americans towards cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A less formal approach to resuscitation decisions is usual in Europe, but few comparable studies have been reported in elderly European populations. We studied the views on resuscitation in a prospective series of elderly Irish patients.
METHODS: We administered a standardized questionnaire to 100 elderly patients who did not have cognitive impairment, depression or terminal or life-threatening illness. Patients were asked if they could wish to be resuscitated following a cardiac arrest in their present state of health and in a number of hypothetical clinical situations.
RESULTS: All of our patients would reject resuscitation in the event of severe functional or mental impairment. Even in their present state of health, only three patients would definitely opt for resuscitation, 74 patients would reject resuscitation, and the remainder would leave the decision to their family or doctor.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that there are substantial differences in attitudes to resuscitation between Irish and American elderly patients. Further studies in other European populations are necessary.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8258004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med        ISSN: 1165-0478


  3 in total

1.  Improving the documentation and appropriateness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions.

Authors:  C L Hignett; D R Forsyth; G D Connor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?

Authors:  E P Cherniack
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly: patients' and relatives' views.

Authors:  G E Mead; C J Turnbull
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.903

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.