Literature DB >> 8257249

A review of common errors in the indirect measurement of blood pressure. Sphygmomanometry.

R H Bailey1, J H Bauer.   

Abstract

There are three sources of error in the indirect measurement of blood pressure: (1) observer bias, (2) faulty equipment, and (3) failure to standardize the techniques of measurement. This article examines each area extensively, discusses the cumulative effect of these errors on the accuracy of indirect blood pressure measurement, and reviews the recommendations for proper indirect measurement of blood pressure.

Mesh：

Year:  1993        PMID： 8257249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN： 0003-9926


  9 in total

1.  Accurate blood pressure measurements and the other arm: the doctor is ultimately responsible.

Authors:  Herbert L Fred
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

2.  Technique of Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  K S Brar; S Ramesh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

3.  The effect of occupational exposure to mercury vapour on the fertility of female dental assistants.

Authors:  P J Colquitt
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Agreement between the Takeda UA-731 automatic blood pressure measuring device and the manual mercury sphygmomanometer: an assessment under field conditions in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Authors:  C Cartwright; N Unwin; P Stephenson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Comparing the effects of white coat hypertension and sustained hypertension on mortality in a UK primary care setting.

Authors:  Martin G Dawes; Gillian Bartlett; Andrew J Coats; Edmund Juszczak
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 6.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  A survey on personnel awareness of the factors affecting accurate blood pressure measurement in the medical centres of Jahrom County.

Authors:  Safar Zarei; Fatemeh Nasimi; Hassanali Abedi; Najmeh Sadeghi
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-04-16

8.  Impact of terminal digit preference by family physicians and sphygmomanometer calibration errors on blood pressure value: implication for hypertension screening.

Authors:  Theophile Niyonsenga; Alain Vanasse; Josiane Courteau; Lyne Cloutier
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Novel methods of testing and calibration of oscillometric blood pressure monitors.

Authors:  Branko G Celler; Ahmadreza Argha; Phu Ngoc Le; Eliathamby Ambikairajah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.