Literature DB >> 8255702

Constraints on haptic integration of spatially shared object dimensions.

S J Lederman1, R L Klatzky, C L Reed.   

Abstract

A study of the haptic integration of texture, shape, and hardness of nonplanar solid objects is reported. In experiment 1 the relative discriminability of the objects along each dimension was assessed. While levels of texture and shape were equally discriminable, hardness discriminations proved considerably more difficult. The extent of dimensional integration in a speeded classification task when both dimensions could be extracted from the same local patch was investigated in experiments 2 and 3. In experiment 2 subjects were initially encouraged to attend to a nontargeted dimension covarying with a targeted one. The nontargeted dimension was subsequently held constant (withdrawn). In experiment 3 dimensional variation was introduced which was uncorrelated with the targeted property during the course of categorization and hence discouraged subjects from attending to the nontargeted property. The results of these two studies converged in showing evidence of bidirectional dimensional integration between texture and shape and unidirectional integration when hardness was the targeted dimension. The failure to integrate hardness into categorization based on texture or shape was attributed to the difficulty of hardness discriminations. Integration effects in experiment 3 were not consistently smaller than those in experiment 2, which suggests a strong involuntary component to dimensional integration. The results of an analysis of the accompanying hand movements are interpreted in terms of constraints on dimensional integration. Implications for visual, cross-modal, and two-handed codimensional processing are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8255702     DOI: 10.1068/p220723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  6 in total

1.  Are surface properties integrated into visuohaptic object representations?

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Jenelle Hall; K Sathian
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Selective perception by dynamic touch.

Authors:  C Carello; M V Santana; G Burton
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

3.  Identifying objects from a haptic glance.

Authors:  R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-11

4.  Perceiving parts and shapes from concave surfaces.

Authors:  Anthony D Cate; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Impact of haptic feedback on applied intracorporeal forces using a novel surgical robotic system-a randomized cross-over study with novices in an experimental setup.

Authors:  Johanna Miller; Manuel Braun; Johannes Bilz; Sebastian Matich; Carsten Neupert; Wolfgang Kunert; Andreas Kirschniak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Global surface features contribute to human haptic roughness estimations.

Authors:  Huazhi Li; Jiajia Yang; Yinghua Yu; Wu Wang; Yulong Liu; Mengni Zhou; Qingqing Li; Jingjing Yang; Shiping Shao; Satoshi Takahashi; Yoshimichi Ejima; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.