Literature DB >> 825376

Immunoglobulin M receptors on memory cells of immunoglobulin G antibody-forming cell clones.

E R Abney, K D Keeler, R M Parkhouse, H N Willcox.   

Abstract

The memory cells of two antibody-forming cell clones had receptors of the IgM class, even though the clones had been producing IgG1 or IgG2a anti-2,4-dinitrophenyl antibodies for 9-15 months previously (on exposure to antigen). Thus a phenotypic switch in heavy chain constant region evidently occurred after re-exposure of these memory cells to antigen. To show that, we first removed the clonal cells' surface immunoglobins by "capping" and "stripping", with class- or subclass-specific antisera. Then, to assay their remaining receptor activity, the cells were incubated with antigen in vitro, washed and transferred (together with carrier primed cells) to irradiated recipients, and their antibody responses to this in vitro boost were assayed by iselectric focusing. Pretreatment with anti-mu serum, as well as with anti-Fab(kappa), prevented the responses of the IgG1 and IgG2a clones to an in vitro boost, while anti-gamma1 and anti-gamma2a antisera had no effect. An antiserum to the putative mouse IgD also had no effect. The anti-mu serum failed to react with the IgG1 and IgG2A clonal serum antibodies in the test tube. Some other contaminating clones were suppressed completely only by the anti-Fab serum. This result strongly suggests that switching in class commitment may occur during the differentiation of memory cells to antibody producers, and may therefore be antigen-dependent. It also implies that some apparently naive cells with surface IgM may, in reality, be B memory cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 825376     DOI: 10.1002/eji.1830060612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Immunol        ISSN: 0014-2980            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

1.  Blocking of primary in vitro antibody responses to thymus-independent and thymus-dependent antigens with antiserum specific for IgM or IgD.

Authors:  J C Cambier; F S Ligler; J W Uhr; J R Kettman; E S Vitetta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Analysis of the immunoglobulin isotype expression by peripheral blood rosette forming cells in chickens.

Authors:  J Ivanyi; G H Evans
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 7.397

3.  The effect of the parenteral administration of a rabbit anti-(mouse)-IgD serum on the immune response of mice to sheep erythrocytes.

Authors:  D W Dresser; R M Parkhouse
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Cell surface immunoglobulin. XX. Antibody responsiveness of subpopulations of B lymphocytes bearing different isotypes.

Authors:  D Yuan; E S Vitetta; J R Kettman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1977-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  Molecular analysis of original antigenic sin. I. Clonal selection, somatic mutation, and isotype switching during a memory B cell response.

Authors:  S Fish; E Zenowich; M Fleming; T Manser
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  The relationship between surface immunoglobulin isotype and immune function of murine B lymphocytes. III. Expression of a single predominant isotype on primed and unprimed B cells.

Authors:  I Zan-Bar; E S Vitetta; F Assisi; S Strober
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1978-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  The relationship between surface immunoglobulin isotype and immune function of murine B lymphocytes. I. Surface immunoglobulin isotypes on primed B cells in the spleen.

Authors:  I Zan-Bar; S Strober; E S Vitetta
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1977-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.