Literature DB >> 8253238

Computerised perimetry with moving and steady fixation in children.

E Mutlukan1, B E Damato.   

Abstract

The computer assisted moving eye campimeter (CAMEC) maintains the patient's interest and fixation by using a moving fixation target which must be tracked by the patient using a joystick for the test to proceed. In this study, 32 children were examined with the blind spot test programs of both CAMEC and the Dicon Auto-Perimeter. Among those who completed both tests the blind spot was detected in 18 eyes (75%) by the Dicon Auto-Perimeter and in 24 eyes (100%) by CAMEC. The mean CAMEC score (61.0%) was significantly higher than the mean Dicon Auto-Perimeter score (26.6%). CAMEC allowed better detection and quantification of scotomas in patients more than 4 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1993        PMID： 8253238     DOI： 10.1038/eye.1993.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN： 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  9 in total

1.  Reliability of kinetic visual field testing in children with mutation-proven retinal dystrophies: Implications for therapeutic clinical trials.

Authors:  Vaidehi S Dedania; Jerry Y Liu; Dana Schlegel; Chris A Andrews; Kari Branham; Naheed W Khan; David C Musch; John R Heckenlively; K Thiran Jayasundera
Journal:  Ophthalmic Genet       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.803

2.  Normal values for Octopus tendency oriented perimetry in children 7 through 13 years old.

Authors:  Sandra M Brown; Jay C Bradley; Matthias J Monhart; Deborah K Baker
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Computerised campimetry with static dark-on-bright stimuli.

Authors:  E Mutlukan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Feasibility of automated visual field examination in children between 5 and 8 years of age.

Authors:  A B Safran; G L Laffi; A Bullinger; P Viviani; C de Weisse; D Désangles; C Tschopp; C Mermoud
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Development of a Pediatric Visual Field Test.

Authors:  Marco A Miranda; David B Henson; Cecilia Fenerty; Susmito Biswas; Tariq Aslam
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Normal Threshold Size of Stimuli in Children Using a Game-Based Visual Field Test.

Authors:  Yanfang Wang; Zaria Ali; Siddharth Subramani; Susmito Biswas; Cecilia Fenerty; David B Henson; Tariq Aslam
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2016-11-24

7.  A case control study examining the feasibility of using eye tracking perimetry to differentiate patients with glaucoma from healthy controls.

Authors:  Andrew J Tatham; Ian C Murray; Alice D McTrusty; Lorraine A Cameron; Antonios Perperidis; Harry M Brash; Brian W Fleck; Robert A Minns
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): Feasibility, Reliability and Repeatability of Perimetry in Children.

Authors:  Dipesh E Patel; Phillippa M Cumberland; Bronwen C Walters; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; Jugnoo S Rahi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.

Authors:  Sibel Kocabeyoglu; Salih Uzun; Mehmet Cem Mocan; Banu Bozkurt; Murat Irkec; Mehmet Orhan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.848
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.