Literature DB >> 8252677

Defibrillating shocks delivered to the heart impair efferent sympathetic responsiveness.

M Ito1, H P Pride, D P Zipes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Functional studies indicate that sympathetic efferents are located in the superficial subepicardium and vagal efferents are located in the subendocardium. It is possible that electrical shocks applied directly to the heart might affect the function of these autonomic nerves. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Low- (< or = 1 J), medium- (6 to 16 J), or high- (30 to 35 J) energy truncated monophasic exponential shocks, synchronized to the R wave during sinus rhythm, were delivered over implantable patches sutured inside the pericardium in anesthetized open-chest dogs. Shortening of ventricular effective refractory period (ERP), produced by bilateral ansae subclaviae stimulation (SS), was measured before and after shock delivery. High-energy shocks shifted the SS frequency-ERP response curves downward and to the right (P < .001) for sites beneath and apical to the patches; ERP shortening at basal sites remained unchanged. Such sympathetic attenuation occurred with shocks > 10 J but not with shocks < or = 10 J, was noted 15 minutes after the shock, and showed incomplete return to control values at 3 hours. Neither low- nor high-energy shocks affected norepinephrine dose-ERP response curves, indicating normal myocardial responsiveness. Low- and high-energy shocks did not attenuate bilateral cervical vagal stimulation-induced ERP prolongation. High-energy shocks delivered over patches sutured to the outside of the pericardium showed no effects on sympathetic response, suggesting a protective effect of the pericardium against shock-induced sympathetic attenuation.
CONCLUSIONS: DC shocks > 10 J delivered directly to the epicardium attenuated efferent sympathetic neural function. Such changes may affect electrophysiological, as well as hemodynamic, responses to sympathetic neural stimulation after cardioversion-defibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8252677     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  4 in total

1.  Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

Authors:  Vadim V Fedorov; Geran Kostecki; Matt Hemphill; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Low-energy multistage atrial defibrillation therapy terminates atrial fibrillation with less energy than a single shock.

Authors:  Wenwen Li; Ajit H Janardhan; Vadim V Fedorov; Qun Sha; Richard B Schuessler; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-10-06

3.  Differential effects of defibrillation on systemic and cardiac sympathetic activity.

Authors:  F Bode; U Wiegand; W Raasch; G Richardt; J Potratz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  QT dispersion significantly increases after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  Serkan Topaloglu; Dursun Aras; Onur Sahin; Kumral Ergun; Bulent Deveci; Ozcan Ozdemir; Ozcan Ozeke; Ali Yildiz; Omer Alyan; Ahmet Duran Demir; Mustafa Soylu; Halil Lutfi Kisacik; Sule Korkmaz
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.