Literature DB >> 8251698

Meaningful interpretation of risk reduction from clinical drug trials.

J P McCormack1, M Levine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the concepts of relative and absolute risk reduction, and by example, present and discuss the results of prevention trials that have evaluated the impact of drug therapy on cardiovascular disease. Additional approaches to evaluating the results of prevention trials are also presented. DATA SOURCES: Data were gathered from eight frequently quoted major cardiovascular intervention trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Reference to large reductions in relative risk in review papers, newspapers, and at professional meetings can lead to false expectations among clinicians and patients regarding the potential impact of the treatment in individual patients. When making decisions about preventive drug therapy, clinicians are encouraged to examine measures other than relative risk reduction and to include the patient in the decision process. Educators should emphasize these other measures of outcome and not rely solely on relative risk reduction in discussing particular areas of therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8251698     DOI: 10.1177/106002809302701018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  2 in total

Review 1.  Primary prevention of heart disease and stroke: a simplified approach to estimating risk of events and making drug treatment decisions.

Authors:  J P McCormack; M Levine; R E Rangno
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Health professionals: how do they assess new medicines?

Authors:  Rebecca Cheng; Kirsty Cook; Sarah Dowman; Rebecca Lawn; Jemma Leary; Taryn Quinn; Kim Schroder; Nicola Smith; June Tordoff
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.