Literature DB >> 8249841

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular structure and diastolic filling in elderly subjects with borderline isolated systolic hypertension (the Framingham Heart Study).

A Sagie1, E J Benjamin, M Galderisi, M G Larson, J C Evans, D L Fuller, B Lehman, D Levy.   

Abstract

Abnormalities in left ventricular (LV) structure and function have been shown in patients with diastolic hypertension and recently in subjects with isolated systolic hypertension. The purpose of this study was to determine whether abnormalities of cardiac structure or function are present in elderly subjects with borderline isolated systolic hypertension (defined as systolic blood pressure [BP] between 140 and 159 mm Hg, and diastolic BP < 90 mm Hg). Ninety-one subjects (mean age 77 years) from the original Framingham Heart Study with untreated borderline isolated systolic hypertension, who were free of cardiovascular disease, were compared with 139 normotensive (BP < 140/90 mm Hg) subjects (mean age 76 years). Measurements included M-mode values for LV structure, and 6 Doppler indexes of LV diastolic filling. Subjects with borderline isolated systolic hypertension and the control group differed in mean systolic (147 vs 125 mm Hg) and diastolic (76 vs 70 mm Hg) BP. Borderline systolic hypertension was the most frequent form of untreated hypertension in this elderly group. The sum of LV wall thicknesses (septum+posterior wall) was significantly higher in borderline hypertensive subjects than in normotensive ones (20.5 vs 19.7 mm; p = 0.002). No difference was detected in LV internal dimension or systolic function. After adjustment for age and other clinical variables, comparisons between the groups revealed significant differences in indexes of Doppler diastolic filling. Peak velocity of early filling, and the ratio of early to late peak velocities were lower in the hypertensive group (40 vs 44 cm/s [p = 0.03] and 0.69 vs 0.76 [p = 0.01], respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8249841     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90881-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular hypertrophy. Prevalence in older patients and management.

Authors:  E Paciaroni; A Fraticelli
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Left ventricular hypertrophy: major risk factor in patients with hypertension: update and practical clinical applications.

Authors:  Richard E Katholi; Daniel M Couri
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.420

Review 3.  Right ventricular diastolic dysfunction and failure: a review.

Authors:  Youn-Hoa Jung; Xianfeng Ren; Giancarlo Suffredini; Jeffery M Dodd-O; Wei Dong Gao
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  ECG Indices Poorly Predict Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Are Applicable Only in Individuals With Low Cardiovascular Risk.

Authors:  Małgorzata Chlabicz; Jacek Jamiołkowski; Marlena Paniczko; Paweł Sowa; Małgorzata Szpakowicz; Magda Łapińska; Natalia Jurczuk; Marcin Kondraciuk; Katarzyna Ptaszyńska-Kopczyńska; Andrzej Raczkowski; Anna Szpakowicz; Karol Adam Kamiński
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Is Peri-Operative Isolated Systolic Hypertension (ISH) a Cardiac Risk Factor?

Authors:  Ashraf Fayad; Homer Yang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2008-02

6.  Reflections in hypertension: heart failure and hypertension: the diastolic dilemma.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.