G Moro1, E Ciambellotti. 1. Divisione di Radioterapia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Biella, Vercelli, Italy.
Abstract
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: This paper describes the evaluation of a personal series of 106 breast cancer patients, aged 28-75 years (average, 54), treated between 1988 and 1971, to determine the success of a conservative protocol proposed as a means of combining radicality with a better cosmetic result, less alteration of the body image and an improved quality of life. METHODS: All the patients were operated with quadrantectomy and excision of axillary lymph nodes, followed by radiotherapy: 50 Gy to the whole breast plus 10 Gy on the tumor bed (boost irradiation). Adjuvant hormone and/or chemotherapy was also administered in 71/106 cases. The mean follow-up was 22.3 months. Cosmetic assessment was subjective and objective (asymmetry, loss of volume, retraction). All patients were photographed. RESULTS: The subjective judgements were: excellent 79, satisfactory 25, and poor 2, compared with objective assessments of 72, 20 and 14, respectively. Patients with poor esthetic results were almost all either T2 or treated with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment of breast cancer using integrated irradiation and surgery can therefore attain the required objective of eradication of the cancer while maintaining a satisfactory esthetic and therefore good psychologic outcome.
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: This paper describes the evaluation of a personal series of 106 breast cancer patients, aged 28-75 years (average, 54), treated between 1988 and 1971, to determine the success of a conservative protocol proposed as a means of combining radicality with a better cosmetic result, less alteration of the body image and an improved quality of life. METHODS: All the patients were operated with quadrantectomy and excision of axillary lymph nodes, followed by radiotherapy: 50 Gy to the whole breast plus 10 Gy on the tumor bed (boost irradiation). Adjuvant hormone and/or chemotherapy was also administered in 71/106 cases. The mean follow-up was 22.3 months. Cosmetic assessment was subjective and objective (asymmetry, loss of volume, retraction). All patients were photographed. RESULTS: The subjective judgements were: excellent 79, satisfactory 25, and poor 2, compared with objective assessments of 72, 20 and 14, respectively. Patients with poor esthetic results were almost all either T2 or treated with chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment of breast cancer using integrated irradiation and surgery can therefore attain the required objective of eradication of the cancer while maintaining a satisfactory esthetic and therefore good psychologic outcome.