Literature DB >> 8248961

Evaluation times for patients with in-hospital strokes.

M J Alberts1, L M Brass, A Perry, D Webb, D V Dawson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Each year at least 35,000 people suffer a stroke while hospitalized, but little is known about the clinical characteristics of such patients or how rapidly they are identified and evaluated. With a recent emphasis on the very early treatment of stroke, in-hospital stroke patients may be candidates for some early interventions.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study using the stroke registries at two academic medical centers. Data were collected about the clinical characteristics of patients with an in-hospital stroke and who recognized the stroke. Detailed time data were analyzed to determine the time of stroke recognition, medical evaluation, and neurological evaluation. These specific time epochs were analyzed to determine which were responsible for any delays in stroke identification and assessment. Data were analyzed using nonparametric methods, including the Wilcoxon rank sum and Kruskal-Wallis procedure.
RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were identified with in-hospital strokes and adequate time data. In-hospital stroke patients were recognized most frequently by nurses (63%) and by the patient (16%). Patients on a cardiology service and general surgery service accounted for 48% of all in-hospital strokes. The mean and median times from stroke recognition to a neurology evaluation were 14.5 and 2.5 hours, respectively. Total delays differed significantly with service and locale (P = .004). Patients on the Duke neurology service were evaluated significantly sooner (median delay, 0.5 hour) than patients on the Duke medical (median delay, 5.8 hours) or Duke surgical (median delay, 20.5 hours; P < .01 by Wilcoxon rank sum) services. Patients on the Yale surgical service were evaluated significantly sooner than patients on the Duke medical (P = .0006) or surgical (P = .0001) services. The time between physician notification and calling for a neurology evaluation accounted for > 60% of the total time delay for patients not on a neurology service.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of in-hospital stroke patients experience a long delay between symptom recognition and a neurological evaluation. While medical personnel are usually notified very soon after an in-hospital stroke is recognized, such patients often do not receive a rapid neurological evaluation. Additional education of hospital staff may reduce these time delays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8248961     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.24.12.1817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  12 in total

1.  Thrombolytic treatment for in-hospital ischemic strokes in United States.

Authors:  Tenbit Emiru; Malik M Adil; M Fareed K Suri; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-12

2.  Worse endovascular mechanical recanalization results for patients with in-hospital onset acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Sebastian Mönch; Manuel Lehm; Christian Maegerlein; Dennis Hedderich; Maria Berndt; Tobias Boeckh-Behrens; Silke Wunderlich; Kornelia Kreiser; Claus Zimmer; Benjamin Friedrich
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  In-Hospital Stroke Care: A Six-Year Community-Based Primary Stroke Center Experience.

Authors:  Felix Ejike Chukwudelunzu; Bart M Demaerschalk; Leonardo Fugoso; Emeka Amadi; Donn Dexter; Angela Gullicksrud; Clinton Hagen
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2021-05-03

Review 4.  In-Hospital Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Ethan Cumbler
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2015-07

5.  Perioperative stroke: risk assessment, prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Daniel C Brooks; Joseph L Schindler
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-02

6.  An unusual cause of fixed dilated pupils after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Joseph D Burns; Edward M Manno; Eelco F M Wijdicks
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Comparison of short-term outcomes of thrombolysis for in-hospital stroke and out-of-hospital stroke in United States.

Authors:  Yogesh Moradiya; Steven R Levine
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Stroke awareness among inpatient nursing staff at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Eric E Adelman; William J Meurer; Dorinda K Nance; Mary Jo Kocan; Kate E Maddox; Lewis B Morgenstern; Lesli E Skolarus
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Mobilisation of hematopoietic CD34+ precursor cells in patients with acute stroke is safe--results of an open-labeled non randomized phase I/II trial.

Authors:  Sandra Boy; Sophie Sauerbruch; Mathias Kraemer; Thorsten Schormann; Felix Schlachetzki; Gerhard Schuierer; Ralph Luerding; Burkhard Hennemann; Evelyn Orso; Andreas Dabringhaus; Jürgen Winkler; Ulrich Bogdahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy.

Authors:  Min-Yi Lu; Chih-Hao Chen; Shin-Joe Yeh; Li-Kai Tsai; Chung-Wei Lee; Sung-Chun Tang; Jiann-Shing Jeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.