Literature DB >> 8247510

Radiographic interproximal angulations: implications for rotational panoramic radiography.

W C Scarfe1, P Nummikoski, W D McDavid, U Welander, G Tronje.   

Abstract

Axial radiographs were taken on 160 subjects at the screening clinic of the Dental School, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. Intermeatal and midsagittal lines, together with coordinate axes and polynomial curves that represent the average dental arch form, were overlaid on each radiograph. Coordinate references for interproximal tangents at 3154 contacts along the average dental arch form were digitized and angulations between the arch form and midsagittal plane calculated. Interproximal angulations at the average arch form were found to vary greatly but the average fluctuated around 90 degrees over the length of the arch. Optimal beam angulations were shown to be considerably different from central ray angulations of current panoramic machines, and although most machines demonstrated favorable interproximal beam angulation in the anterior region, discrepancy in the premolar region ranged from 15 degrees to over 40 degrees. Overall the OrthOralix SD (Gendex Dental Systems, S.r.l., Monza, Italy) orthogonal projection and PM 2002 CC (Planmeca Inc. Helsinki, Finland) deviate least from optimal interproximal angulation over most of the dental arch. However, the Planmeca gives a better angulation in the canine/premolar region, whereas the OP5/10 (Palomex Instrumentarium Corp., Helsinki, Finland) is comparable with the OrthOralix SD in the molar region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8247510     DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(93)90079-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol        ISSN: 0030-4220


  6 in total

1.  A preliminary study for determination of three-dimensional root apex position of the maxillary teeth using camera calibration technology.

Authors:  Hyun Jun Oh; Il-Hyung Yang; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A clinical comparison of extraoral panoramic and intraoral radiographic modalities for detecting proximal caries and visualizing open posterior interproximal contacts.

Authors:  Glenn L Terry; Marcel Noujeim; Robert P Langlais; William S Moore; Thomas J Prihoda
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with posttreatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Daniel G Bouwens; Lucia Cevidanes; John B Ludlow; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Implant-to-nasal floor dimensions projected by panoramic radiographs in the maxillary incisor-canine region: implications for dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Annika Bertram; Alexander W Eckert; Rüdiger Emshoff
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?

Authors:  Christos Livas; Demetrios J Halazonetis; Johan W Booij; Christos Katsaros; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Implant-to-root dimensions projected by panoramic radiographs inthe maxillary canine-premolar region: implications for dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Annika Bertram; Alexander W Eckert; Rüdiger Emshoff
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.930

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.