S R Patel1, H L Evans, R S Benjamin. 1. Department of Melanoma/Sarcoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Desmoid tumors are locally aggressive tumors, with no metastatic potential, that generally are amenable to local treatments, such as surgery and radiation therapy. Systemic therapy is considered for selected cases that are not amenable to local treatment. METHODS: The authors reviewed their experience with chemotherapy in desmoid tumors. A patient population was identified through a search of the data base maintained by the Department of Patient Studies. RESULTS: Between January 1971 and December 1991, 180 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of desmoid tumor were seen at the authors' institution. Twelve patients (8 male and 4 female patients; age range, 16-66 years; median age, 29 years) received chemotherapy. Eleven patients received doxorubicin (60-90 mg/m2) plus dacarbazine (750-1000 mg/m2)-based regimens for a median of 5 cycles (2-10 cycles). Six of the nine patients who could be evaluated for response had an objective response (two complete responses and four partial responses), one patient had a minor response, and two patients had stable disease. Two other patients treated in the early 1970s could not be evaluated objectively because of lack of modern imaging; however, they were reported to have "responses" that enabled resection of axillary and pelvic disease. All four patients with Gardner syndrome experienced disease response. One of these four patients had a complete response twice with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy and eventually died with an ejection fraction of 0.22. Five patients are alive with no evidence of disease (NED), four are alive with disease, and two are lost to follow-up after having an NED status at their last visit. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that desmoid tumors in adults are responsive to chemotherapy, and such treatment should be considered before embarking on radical treatment to avoid obvious functional consequences and delayed complications.
BACKGROUND:Desmoid tumors are locally aggressive tumors, with no metastatic potential, that generally are amenable to local treatments, such as surgery and radiation therapy. Systemic therapy is considered for selected cases that are not amenable to local treatment. METHODS: The authors reviewed their experience with chemotherapy in desmoid tumors. A patient population was identified through a search of the data base maintained by the Department of Patient Studies. RESULTS: Between January 1971 and December 1991, 180 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of desmoid tumor were seen at the authors' institution. Twelve patients (8 male and 4 female patients; age range, 16-66 years; median age, 29 years) received chemotherapy. Eleven patients received doxorubicin (60-90 mg/m2) plus dacarbazine (750-1000 mg/m2)-based regimens for a median of 5 cycles (2-10 cycles). Six of the nine patients who could be evaluated for response had an objective response (two complete responses and four partial responses), one patient had a minor response, and two patients had stable disease. Two other patients treated in the early 1970s could not be evaluated objectively because of lack of modern imaging; however, they were reported to have "responses" that enabled resection of axillary and pelvic disease. All four patients with Gardner syndrome experienced disease response. One of these four patients had a complete response twice with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy and eventually died with an ejection fraction of 0.22. Five patients are alive with no evidence of disease (NED), four are alive with disease, and two are lost to follow-up after having an NED status at their last visit. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that desmoid tumors in adults are responsive to chemotherapy, and such treatment should be considered before embarking on radical treatment to avoid obvious functional consequences and delayed complications.
Authors: Mrinal M Gounder; Robert A Lefkowitz; Mary Louise Keohan; David R D'Adamo; Meera Hameed; Cristina R Antonescu; Samuel Singer; Katherine Stout; Linda Ahn; Robert G Maki Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Andrew J Bishop; Jace P Landry; Christina L Roland; Ravin Ratan; Barry W Feig; Bryan S Moon; Maria A Zarzour; Wei-Lien Wang; Alexander J Lazar; Valerae O Lewis; Keila E Torres; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jae-Cheol Jo; Yong Sang Hong; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Jae-Lyun Lee; Jeeyun Lee; Young Suk Park; Sun Young Kim; Jin-Sook Ryu; Jong-Seok Lee; Tae Won Kim Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Marcus Overhaus; Pan Decker; Hans Peter Fischer; Hans Jochen Textor; Andreas Hirner Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2003-07-09 Impact factor: 2.754