BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the most accepted treatment for localized osteosarcoma. This has led to a great improvement in limb-sparing surgery and in disease-free survival. Patients with a good response to preoperative chemotherapy showed a higher disease-free survival rate. Current studies examine the possibility of patients whose limbs could be rescued with a poor necrosis and a reduction of the side effects related to aggressive treatments. METHODS: Between September 1986 and December 1989, 164 patients entered the second neoadjuvant study conducted at the Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy, for non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of high-dose methotrexate intravenously (i.v.) followed by cisplatin intraarterially and doxorubicin i.v. After surgery, patients classified as good responders (> 90% tumor necrosis) received three more cycles of these drugs, whereas poor responders (< 90% tumor necrosis) had more chemotherapy, which included ifosfamide and etoposide in addition to the other three drugs. RESULTS: Limb salvage was performed in 83% of cases. At an average follow-up of 54 months (36-76), 109 patients (66%) were continuously disease-free, 2 died from doxorubicin cardiotoxicity, and 52 experienced metastases and 3 had local recurrence. In two of these three patients, metastases followed local recurrence. The 5-year actuarial continuously disease-free survival rate was 63%, with no differences between good and poor responders. Excluding 20 patients who had major protocol violations, the projected continuous disease-free survival rate was 71%. CONCLUSIONS: With an aggressive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, it is possible to cure more than 60% of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities, avoiding amputation in most cases. Ifosfamide and etoposide seem to be effective in patients who did not respond to preoperative chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the most accepted treatment for localized osteosarcoma. This has led to a great improvement in limb-sparing surgery and in disease-free survival. Patients with a good response to preoperative chemotherapy showed a higher disease-free survival rate. Current studies examine the possibility of patients whose limbs could be rescued with a poor necrosis and a reduction of the side effects related to aggressive treatments. METHODS: Between September 1986 and December 1989, 164 patients entered the second neoadjuvant study conducted at the Rizzoli Institute, Bologna, Italy, for non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of high-dose methotrexate intravenously (i.v.) followed by cisplatin intraarterially and doxorubicin i.v. After surgery, patients classified as good responders (> 90% tumor necrosis) received three more cycles of these drugs, whereas poor responders (< 90% tumor necrosis) had more chemotherapy, which included ifosfamide and etoposide in addition to the other three drugs. RESULTS: Limb salvage was performed in 83% of cases. At an average follow-up of 54 months (36-76), 109 patients (66%) were continuously disease-free, 2 died from doxorubicincardiotoxicity, and 52 experienced metastases and 3 had local recurrence. In two of these three patients, metastases followed local recurrence. The 5-year actuarial continuously disease-free survival rate was 63%, with no differences between good and poor responders. Excluding 20 patients who had major protocol violations, the projected continuous disease-free survival rate was 71%. CONCLUSIONS: With an aggressive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, it is possible to cure more than 60% of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities, avoiding amputation in most cases. Ifosfamide and etoposide seem to be effective in patients who did not respond to preoperative chemotherapy.
Authors: J Aparicio; A Segura; J Montalar; S Garcerá; A Oltra; A Santaballa; A Yuste; M Pastor; B Munárriz Journal: Med Oncol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Cindy L Schwartz; Leonard H Wexler; Mark D Krailo; Lisa A Teot; Meenakshi Devidas; Laurel J Steinherz; Allen M Goorin; Mark C Gebhardt; John H Healey; Judith K Sato; Paul A Meyers; Holcombe E Grier; Mark L Bernstein; Steven E Lipshultz Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Andrea Angelini; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Giulia Trovarelli; Stefano Ferrari; Piero Picci; Pietro Ruggieri Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 4.553